Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let be the maximal number of edges in an -uniform hypergraph which contains no set of many independent edges.
For all ,
Let be the maximal number of edges in an -uniform hypergraph on vertices which contains no set of many independent edges.
For all and ,
Source: erdosproblems.com/1020
No claim settles this problem.
Open on the site, under the label FALSIFIABLE (page last edited 28 December 2025). The site's commentary calls this the Erdős matching conjecture, records the Erdős–Gallai theorem for [ErGa59] (its parenthesis ties the Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem to as well; that theorem gives the case for every ), notes that the two examples (all -sets of an -set, and all -sets meeting a fixed -set) show the conjectured value cannot be raised, that the second term dominates once , and Frankl's bound [Fr87], and lists the ranges in which the conjecture is known: for small , trivially for , at by Kleitman [Kl68], for by Frankl [Fr17], and for , and by Kolupaev and Kupavskii [KoKu23]; for large , for by Erdős [Er65d], by Frankl and Füredi [Fr87], by Bollobás, Daykin and Erdős [BDE76], by Huang, Loh and Sudakov [HLS12], by Frankl, Łuczak and Mieczkowska [FLM12], and, for , by Frankl, Rödl and Ruciński [FRR12] and then every by Łuczak and Mieczkowska [LuMi14].
The site's wording fails in two ways. It never says what counts, and with no bound on the number of vertices the maximum does not exist for : the -sets through one fixed vertex of an arbitrarily large set have no two disjoint members. The site's commentary calls the conjecture trivially true for . The change inserts the words "on vertices" in the definition and "and " after "For all "; nothing else changes. The evidence is the poser's own words. Erdős's paper [Er65d] defines through -graphs of vertices (p. 93), states the case , the Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem, for , adds that the case is trivial since then no two -tuples are independent, and says on p. 95 that this theorem proves the conjecture for . Bollobás, Daykin and Erdős [BDE76], p. 26, restate the conjecture of [Er65d] for "an -graph with vertices", where their is the problem's , so the range is . The literature states the same range: [KoKu23] Conjecture 1.1 (arXiv:2206.01526, p. 1) assumes , with uniformity and matching number , which is in the problem's notation. The missing vertex count is the site's slip. The missing range is already in the poser's text: [Er65d] display (9), p. 95, prints the conjectured value with no range on , and the site reproduces it. The form rests on these sources alone, not on which results settle it. No result concerns the site's wording alone: each claim page settles a range of the corrected Statement. The problem's standing judges the corrected Statement.