Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let be a graph on vertices with many edges. Must there be a triangle in and vertices , where , such that every vertex is joined to at least two vertices of ?
Source: erdosproblems.com/1034
An accepted solution exists. The statement is false.
Disproved. The status-defining source is Theorem 2.1 of a
three-page note by Jie Ma and Quanyu Tang, On Erdős problem #1034 (the file
the site links on the first author's page; no arXiv identifier or journal; PDF
metadata 21 October 2025): for every and all sufficiently large
there is a graph on vertices with more than edges in which no
triangle has more than vertices with two or more
neighbors on it, where . The construction
is explicit (a complete bipartite graph between a side of
vertices partitioned into cliques of about
vertices and an independent side, optimized at
) and the proof is a two-page computation, followed
here. The claim page
Ma and Tang
records the disproof as accepted on the site's documented acceptance (its label
DISPROVED (LEAN), the page last edited 28 October 2025; the community database
lists "disproved (Lean)" as of its last update of 4 December 2025) and carries,
as a formalization link, the external Lean file that declares itself a
formalization of the note's solution and proves the negation of the formalized
statement, not built here. This is a source-supported solution accepted by
the site, distinct from a claim of journal refereeing; the site's Lean suffix
is its catalog label for that external proof, which this corpus has not built
or audited. Erdős's general question, the largest
for which every such graph has a triangle and other vertices joined to
two of its vertices, stays open between and
.