Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let be the maximal size of such that no divides the sum of any distinct elements of . Estimate . In particular, is it true that
Source: erdosproblems.com/131
A full solution has been claimed but not yet accepted. Settled in another form, for example when its parts resolve differently or the question is open-ended.
Open on the site, for the estimate; the label OPEN attaches to
it. The displayed question is answered no: every non-dividing set is
non-averaging (if were the average of a nonempty
then would divide the sum of ), so Pham
and Zakharov's Theorem 1, the largest non-averaging subset of
has elements (Geom. Funct. Anal. 2025,
refereed), gives , and fails for
large ; this is recorded as an accepted partial claim on
the Pham--Zakharov claim page (2024).
The estimate carries one pending full claim, , submitted
to the site's proof-claim tab on 24 July 2026 and recorded on
the Xeff claim page (2026),
unexamined by the site and unreviewed; the frontmatter standing claimed
derives from it and certifies nothing. In the literature the order of
is open between the constructions and that bound: Straus's
(1975, p. 309), the bound
, which the 1999 paper deduces (p. 128) from Straus's
transfer theorem and Bosznay's non-averaging sets and which [Er97b]
(pp. 230--231) credits to a Budapest student without printing a
construction, and ; the 1999 paper's explicit
(Corollary 2, p. 128) is superseded. The two 1999 bounds
are recorded as an accepted partial claim on
the 1999 claim page (Erdos Lev Rauzy Sandor Sarkozy, 1999).