Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let be minimal such that every triangle-free graph with vertices and diameter contains a vertex with degree .
What is the order of growth of ? Does ?
Let be maximal such that every triangle-free graph with vertices and diameter contains a vertex with degree .
What is the order of growth of ? Does ?
Source: erdosproblems.com/133
An accepted solution exists. The statement is false.
Disproved. The site's label answers the second question: Erdős and Pach conjectured , and has order exactly . The trivial bound (a graph of diameter with every degree at most has at most vertices) is matched by Cayley graphs on symmetric complete sum-free sets: Hanson and Seyffarth [HaSe84] gave , a bound that the site, Füredi and Seress and Alon state for all large and Haviv and Levy for the sequence (claim page (Hanson and Seyffarth, 1984), partial), and Haviv and Levy [HaLe18] constructed such sets in every large cyclic group, proving for every large (claim page (Haviv and Levy, 2017)). Füredi and Seress's projective-plane construction [FuSe94] gives the best known constant, for all large (claim page (Füredi and Seress, 1994)); the last two are refereed and settle the problem. The constant, between and , is not asked and is open; Alon's 2024 note, also cited on Problem 134, conjectures , and one unreviewed proof claim of 2026-09-15 on the site's proof-claim tab asserts that the constant is (claim page (Korsky, 2026)). A Lean development attributed to Hanson and Seyffarth's result is linked from their claim page and is not built here. Search scope, 2026-10-07: the site's commentary, its comment thread (empty) and its proof-claim tab.
The site's wording takes the least such that every triangle-free graph of diameter on vertices has a vertex of degree at least . Every value up to the least maximum degree of such a graph has that property, so the least one is for every and both questions become trivial. The smallest failing instance is : the only triangle-free graph of diameter on three vertices is the path, of maximum degree , while the minimal is . The change replaces "minimal" by "maximal"; the largest value with the property is the least possible maximum degree of a triangle-free graph of diameter on vertices. The evidence is the poser's own statement of the question: [Er97b] item 7, p. 229, defines as the smallest integer for which some triangle-free graph on vertices of diameter two has maximum degree , and states the Erdős--Pach conjecture for that function. Füredi and Seress define their in the same way (Section 6 of [FuSe94], p. 23), and the site's own commentary derives the lower bound , which holds only for the corrected . The defect is the site's; [Er97b] has the right extremum. No result about the site's wording is recorded.