Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let and , so that and for , where
Let be any other sequence with . Is it true that
Source: erdosproblems.com/315
An accepted solution exists. The statement is true.
Proved, by two independent sources. Li and Tang's Corollary 1.7 (arXiv:2503.12277, March 2025) proves exactly the statement: every strictly increasing sequence of positive integers other than Sylvester's with reciprocal sum has . Kamio's Theorem 8 (arXiv:2503.02317, March 2025; an author preprint) proves it for nondecreasing sequences and for every unit fraction in place of . The two preprints appeared eleven days apart: Li and Tang's Remark 1.13 records Kamio's proof as independent, and Kamio's, the earlier one, does not cite theirs. Neither proof has a refereed publication: Li and Tang's Acta Math. Hungar. paper (177 (2025), 41--63) publishes their conditional generalization and cites the preprint for the proof of this statement. Kovač and Tang's 2026 preprint generalizes the statement to rationals and re-derives it by a non-constructive route; it is a pending claim. The site's label is PROVED (LEAN); its Lean qualifier is a catalog label whose scope is qualified under Formalization and the Lean label below, and no local kernel credit is claimed. The two accepted claims are recorded on Li and Tang's claim page (2025) and Kamio's claim page (2025), and the pending claim on Kovač and Tang's claim page (2026).