Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
What is the size of the largest such that all sums are distinct for ?
Source: erdosproblems.com/321
An accepted solution exists. Settled in another form, for example when its parts resolve differently or the question is open-ended.
Solved, in the site's label, which the site glosses as a resolution other than a proof or disproof, for the order of magnitude
The lower bound is refereed and is written out below: Bleicher and Erdős's set of products of rapidly growing primes (1975) has distinct subset reciprocal sums and gives the site's displayed lower bound, and the set in Bettin, Grenié, Molteni and Sanna's proof (Math. Comp., online 22 January 2026) has the same property and gives , a bound the paper does not state and the site calls implicit in it. The refereed upper bound, with Bleicher and Erdős's 1976 Theorem 3, carries the extra factor ; the upper bound of the same order as the lower is the bound for obtained with the AI system GPT 5.6 Sol Pro and accepted by the site on Problem 320 (claim of 15 July 2026, unrefereed), restated for this problem in the accepted claim on this page's tab. So the matching of the two bounds behind the label rests on that accepted claim, whose page for this problem is the order of magnitude of R(N). The three refereed bounds have their own partial claim pages, linked under Progress and known results, and the standing derives from the four pages.