Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Is it true that, in any two-colouring of the edges of , there exist monochromatic paths, all of the same colour, which cover all vertices?
Source: erdosproblems.com/518
A full solution has been claimed but not yet accepted. The statement is true.
The site labels the problem PROVED and its curator credits Pokrovskiy, Versteegen and Williams with the affirmative answer. The credited result is Theorem 1.3 of their paper (J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 176 (2026), 551--560, refereed; the statement here follows arXiv v2 of 7 October 2025), which states the conclusion for all . For the paper proves only its Proposition 3.4 (p. 7), that fewer than monochromatic paths of one color always suffice (its remark that paths suffice for every is announced "with some additional technical effort", not proved), and the statement for every is claimed in an unrefereed 2026 preprint of Chen and Chen, the one entry of the site's proof-claims tab, which the site has not adopted. The claim pages Pokrovskiy, Versteegen and Williams 2024 (accepted on the site's credit and the refereed publication, partial: every ) and Chen and Chen 2026 (claimed, the statement for every ) record the results, their postings and their acceptance evidence, and the frontmatter standing derives from them: the problem stands as claimed through the pending full claim, while the site's label rests on the large- theorem, read here as settling the question for large only. No review of the proof is recorded.