Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let be (not necessarily distinct) residues modulo , such that there exists some so that if is non-empty and
then . Must there be at most two distinct residues amongst the ?
Source: erdosproblems.com/541
An accepted solution exists. The statement is true.
The site's label is PROVED (LEAN). Gao, Hamidoune and Wang's Theorem 1.1 (J. Number Theory 2010, refereed): a sequence of integers in taking at least three distinct values has two nonempty zero-sum subsequences modulo of distinct lengths. Read contrapositively with (an authored one-line deduction, below), it gives the site's statement for every prime, and indeed for every modulus. Erdős and Szemerédi proved the conjecture for all sufficiently large primes in 1976, for nonzero residues, by a longer argument. The site's (LEAN) suffix refers to the Lean proof described under Formalization and the Lean label below. The claim pages Gao, Hamidoune and Wang 2009 and Grynkiewicz 2009 record the accepted proofs, Erdős and Szemerédi 1976 the accepted partial claim for large primes, and Alexeev's Lean proof of 2025 the accepted formal proof for every prime, built and audited by this corpus; the frontmatter standing derives from them.