Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Show that for
Source: erdosproblems.com/572
No claim settles this problem.
Open. The answer is yes for and : Benson's incidence graphs of girth eight and twelve (1966) give and , and Bondy and Simonovits (1974) record the matching constructions as known for ; Benson's result is the accepted partial claim Benson 1966, refereed in Canad. J. Math., which settles the instances and , and the instance is also the accepted partial claim Lazebnik, Ustimenko and Woldar 1995; neither settles the problem. For and every no construction reaching the exponent is known: the best general lower bound the site cites is ( for odd , for even ), of a smaller order than for every , from Lazebnik, Ustimenko and Woldar's 1995 paper (the site cites their 1999 paper for history), which at gives the instance itself; the parity term is the paper's own (Corollary 3.3), and Chung's 1997 survey quotes the bound without it. No proof or disproof for any outside was found in the search whose scope the Current assessment records. This is a bounded negative finding, not a certificate of openness.