Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Status
On this page
Status
Topics
Let be maximal such that if with then there exists a sum-free with - that is, is such that there are no solutions to
with all distinct.
Estimate . In particular, is it true that ? Is it true that for some ?
Source: erdosproblems.com/790
A full solution has been claimed but not yet accepted. Settled in another form, for example when its parts resolve differently or the question is open-ended.
Open, the site's label. The bounds in hand are the Theorem of Choi, Komlós and Szemerédi (Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 212 (1975), refereed; an accepted partial claim on its claim page (Choi, Komlós and Szemerédi, 1975)), , which answer the first displayed question affirmatively and leave the second open; the paper's closing remark that it is "conceivable that for every " (p. 313) is the conjecture that the site attributes to the authors. Erdős's (1965, inequality (30)) and Choi's improvement (Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 39 (1973), refereed, not held; an accepted partial claim on its claim page (Choi, 1973)) are the earlier lower bounds; the site, following Erdős 1973, writes Choi's bound as , while the zbMATH review of the paper gives . Erdős's 1965 claim that was withdrawn in 1973, the year Choi proved (Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 41 (1973), 415--418). Inequality (30) and the second 1973 paper have no claim pages: (30) appeared in a proceedings volume with only a sketch of its proof and is superseded by Choi's refereed bound, and the site does not credit the second paper, whose bound the 1975 Theorem supersedes. A full proof claim on the site's tab (13 September 2026), declaring the use of GPT Astra, claims and is recorded as a pending claim on its claim page (Korsky, 2026); the site's label was OPEN on 2026-09-18 and on 2026-10-06, and its commentary does not mention the claim. The search whose scope the Current assessment records found no refereed improvement of either bound. This is a bounded negative finding, not a certificate of openness.