Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Proposition 6, p. 6, of Wouter van Doorn, Completeness of exponentially increasing sequences, arXiv:2602.23394v1 (25 February 2026), the version named on the source card. A preprint.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the page images of the print; the proof was read for structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Statement

Setting (p. 1). For positive reals tt and α\alpha, St(α)=(s1,s2,…)S_t(\alpha)=(s_1,s_2,\ldots) with sn=⌊tαn⌋s_n=\lfloor t\alpha^n\rfloor, indexed from n=1n=1. For a sequence or multiset SS of positive integers, P(S)P(S) is the set of integers that are sums of distinct elements of SS; SS is complete when N∖P(S)\mathbb N\setminus P(S) is finite and entirely complete when P(S)=NP(S)=\mathbb N. Throughout, φ=(1+5)/2\varphi=(1+\sqrt5)/2.

Proposition 6 (p. 6). If 1<α<321<\alpha<\tfrac32, then St(α)S_t(\alpha) is entirely complete if and only if t<2αt<\frac2\alpha. In particular, if t≤43t\le\frac43, then St(α)S_t(\alpha) is entirely complete for all these values of α\alpha.

The statement concerns entire completeness only: for t≥2/αt\ge2/\alpha it says nothing about completeness.

Proof pointer

For t≥2/αt\ge2/\alpha, 1∉P(St(α))1\notin P(S_t(\alpha)); for 1≤t<2/α1\le t<2/\alpha, s1=1s_1=1 and Lemma 4 gives sn+1≤2sns_{n+1}\le2s_n for all n≥1n\ge1, and the paper's Lemma 3 concludes (p. 6).

Dependencies

Lemma 4, Lemma 3 of the paper, and Graham (1964) for t<1t<1.

Bears on

  • Problem 349: every pair with 1<α<321<\alpha<\tfrac32 and t<2/αt<2/\alpha gives a complete sequence; the pairs with t≥2/αt\ge2/\alpha are left open by this result.