Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (p. 420). is a finite set of non-negative integers. A set is a basis for when every is for some . The paper writes for the number of elements of , for its largest element and for the least number of elements of a basis of .
Theorem 1 (p. 420, quoted). "."
The paper derives the three bounds as its observations 1--3 (p. 420):
- , since is a basis for .
- : for an integer , the integers together with the multiples form a basis of the whole interval , with elements, and the paper records .
- , in the sharper form : a basis of elements produces at most sums , and these must cover the elements of .
Sharpness of the first upper bound (p. 421). For the paper shows : each with forces an element of in , these intervals are disjoint, and forces an element in , which lies in none of them. The paper's stated view (p. 421) is that the truth is usually nearer the upper bound than the lower, which Theorem 2 makes precise.
Source. P. Erdős and D. J. Newman, Bases for sets of integers, J. Number Theory 9 (1977), no. 4, 420--425: the setting, the observations and the theorem on p. 420, the example on p. 421. The edition read is identified on the source card.
Read depth. Claims checked: the setting, the three observations, the statement and the p. 421 example were read clause by clause on the page images. The observations carry their own one-line proofs, which were followed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Page 420, observations 1--3 above; each is a one-line argument (a trivial basis, a basis of the whole interval , and a count of pairs).
Dependencies
None.
Bears on
- Problem 806: for the bound gives a basis of order for every such ; the problem asks whether is always possible when , so the theorem is the trivial bound the question asks to beat. In the paper's terms, it gives for the closing question of p. 425.