Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Section 4, Remarks, p. 655, of J. Folkman, On the representation of integers as sums of distinct terms from a fixed sequence, Canad. J. Math. 18 (1966), 643--655, doi:10.4153/CJM-1966-065-2. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Statement

In the paper "increasing" means a1≤a2≤⋯a_1\le a_2\le\cdots and "strictly increasing" means a1<a2<⋯a_1<a_2<\cdots; AA is subcomplete when its set P(A)P(A) of sums of distinct terms contains an infinite arithmetic progression.

Counterexamples for α>1\alpha>1 (p. 655). Let α>1\alpha>1. The paper says that it is easy to construct an increasing sequence with an≤nαa_n\le n^{\alpha} for which

(4.1)sup⁡n(an+1−∑i=1nai)=∞,\text{(4.1)}\qquad \sup_n\Bigl(a_{n+1}-\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i\Bigr)=\infty,

and such a sequence is not subcomplete; a similar construction gives a strictly increasing sequence satisfying (4.1) and an≤n1+αa_n\le n^{1+\alpha}. The paper concludes that its theorems, among them Theorem 1.3, are false for α>1\alpha>1. The constructions are described, not written out. The paper adds that Cassels (Acta Sci. Math. Szeged 21 (1960), 111--124) constructs counterexamples to Theorem 1.2 and to the strictly increasing case of Theorem 1.3 for α>1\alpha>1 that also satisfy an+1=an+o(an1/2+ϵ)a_{n+1}=a_n+o(a_n^{1/2+\epsilon}) for an arbitrary preassigned ϵ>0\epsilon>0.

Open questions (p. 655). The paper leaves open:

  1. Whether every increasing sequence with an≤Mna_n\le Mn for all nn is subcomplete.
  2. Whether every strictly increasing sequence with an≤Mn2a_n\le Mn^2 for n≥n0n\ge n_0, where M≤1/2M\le1/2, is subcomplete. The paper notes that M≤1/2M\le1/2 is required so that AA cannot satisfy (4.1).

The two questions are the boundary case α=1\alpha=1 of the growth conditions (1.1) and (1.3), which neither the theorems (0≤α<10\le\alpha<1) nor the counterexamples (α>1\alpha>1) cover.

Read depth. Claims checked: the section was read clause by clause on the print. The constructions and Cassels's paper were not read.

Dependencies

None in the corpus. External: Cassels's counterexamples, cited, not proved.

Bears on

  • Problem 343: the first open question is the problem's question in Folkman's form, for a nondecreasing sequence with an≤Mna_n\le Mn, the constant MM depending on the sequence. The paper gives no answer. Its increasing counterexample with an≤nαa_n\le n^{\alpha}, α>1\alpha>1, has at least ⌊N1/α⌋\lfloor N^{1/\alpha}\rfloor terms up to NN, so counting functions of order N1−ϵN^{1-\epsilon} do not force subcompleteness.
  • Problem 344: the second open question concerns strictly increasing sequences with quadratic growth an≤Mn2a_n\le Mn^2 for n≥n0n\ge n_0, M≤1/2M\le1/2; such a set has at least ⌊(N/M)1/2⌋\lfloor(N/M)^{1/2}\rfloor elements up to NN once that number is at least n0n_0, and (N/M)1/2≥(2N)1/2(N/M)^{1/2}\ge(2N)^{1/2}, so the question is of the square-root density the problem asks about. The paper gives no answer.