Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Lemma 5.4 (p. 347), with the notation of §5.2 (pp. 346–347) and Lemma 5.3 (p. 347), of G. Grekos, L. Haddad, C. Helou, J. Pihko, On the Erdős–Turán conjecture, Journal of Number Theory 102 (2003), no. 2, 339–352, the edition named on the source card.
Statement
Setting (§5.2). (with ), , and
where is finite and . As before, counts ordered pairs, and (§4.1, p. 346).
Lemma 5.3 (p. 347). . Its proof shows that the translates , , are pairwise disjoint.
Lemma 5.4 (p. 347). For write with and . Then
When the second term is absent: the proof sums over only, so is read as (a reading made here; the paper defines for ).
Read depth. Claims checked: the setting, Lemma 5.3 and Lemma 5.4 were read clause by clause on the printed pp. 346–347, and the short proofs of both were read.
Proof pointer
Squaring Lemma 5.3 gives for the generating series of , so over . Since for and , only () and () survive.
The paper uses the lemma for Proposition 5.6 and Theorem 5.7.
Bears on
- Problem 1145: an identity for the self-representation function of one set; it gives no bound on the problem's cross count .