Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Theorem (p. 131, unnumbered), quoted: "Let be a polynomial of degree with nonnegative coefficients. Let be a set of nonnegative numbers such that every integer can be written as for some integer and some in . Then given , we have
for all sufficiently large ."
Here is the cardinality of and the inverse function of (p. 130); Section 2 (p. 131) notes that is strictly increasing on and so maps it one-to-one onto , with strictly increasing. The proof (pp. 131--134) uses the covering hypothesis only for the integers . The abstract (p. 130) states the same theorem with the same hypotheses. The introduction (p. 130) poses the problem for nonnegative integer coefficients and a set of integers, where the hypothesis gives at once ; the theorem drops both integrality conditions and asks instead that consist of nonnegative numbers.
The constant. The paper writes
(p. 134), as the ratio of to , the latter evaluated by Euler's beta integral as .
Applications (Section 4, p. 134). For the bound is , which the paper says improves the bound of Balasubramanian and Soundararajan; for it is , improving Balasubramanian's . The paper states that is always greater than , Balasubramanian's general constant, so the theorem improves that result for every ; it gives no proof of this comparison. The introduction (pp. 130--131) lists the earlier bounds it improves: Moser's for , Donagi and Herzog's , Balasubramanian's , and Balasubramanian and Soundararajan's for .
Remarks (p. 135). The paper records Balazard's observation that a set of the form gives an additive completion of the values on of size asymptotic to , and asks for smaller examples or a proof that the constant is optimal. A note added in proof states that Cilleruelo (J. Number Theory 44 (1993), 237--243) proved the case , an integer, independently.
Source. Laurent Habsieger, On the additive completion of polynomial sets, J. Number Theory 51 (1995), no. 1, 130--135, doi:10.1006/jnth.1995.1039: the theorem on p. 131, Lemmas 1--3 on pp. 131--133, the proof in Section 3 on pp. 133--134, and Section 4 (applications and remarks) on pp. 134--135, read on the page images of the edition identified on the source card.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, its hypotheses, the constant and the Section 4 values were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof was read but not checked step by step. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Pp. 131--134. Fix of order , so , and let be the set of ratios for with ; then and . Lemma 1 (p. 131) gives a constant , which the paper calls absolute and whose value in the proof (p. 132) is built from the coefficients of , with for and . Lemma 2 (p. 132) bounds , for a nonnegative on , by a sum over of a function ; Lemma 3 (p. 132) controls the range of in each term. With the left side is at least and each is at most , which gives . The paper explains the gain over Balasubramanian's method by this choice of , for which is almost constant on (p. 134).
Bears on
- Problem 33: the problem asks whether every such that every large integer is with , , has . If every integer above is so written, then for each the set completes the squares on and has , so the theorem with gives a liminf of at least , answering that question yes. On the limsup it gives only the same lower bound ; it does not determine the smallest limsup.