Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Theorem 3, p. 3, of Sándor Z. Kiss and Csaba Sándor, Generalized Sidon sets of perfect powers, The Ramanujan Journal 59 (2022), no. 2, 351--363, doi:10.1007/s11139-022-00622-z. Labels and pages are those of arXiv:2006.02783v1 (4 June 2020), the edition named on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the printed page. The proof (Section 4, pp. 8--11) was read for structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Statement

Setting as in Theorem 2: RA,h(n)R_{A,h}(n) counts solutions of a1+⋯+ah=na_1+\cdots+a_h=n with a1<⋯<aha_1<\cdots<a_h in AA.

Theorem 3 (p. 3). For every k≥2k\ge2 there is a positive integer h0(k)=O(8kk2)h_0(k)=O(8^kk^2) such that for every h≥h0(k)h\ge h_0(k) and every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is a set A⊆(Z+)kA\subseteq(\mathbb Z^+)^k such that RA,h(n)R_{A,h}(n) is bounded and

A(x)≫x1h−ε=xmin⁡{1k,1h}−ε.A(x)\gg x^{\frac1h-\varepsilon}=x^{\min\{\frac1k,\frac1h\}-\varepsilon}.

The theorem is unconditional. As with Theorem 2, it bounds the strict-order count RA,hR_{A,h}, not RA,h∗R^*_{A,h}, so it does not give a Bh[g]B_h[g] set; the paper's closing remark (p. 11) leaves that extension open.

Proof pointer

Section 4 (pp. 8--11). Each kk-th power nn is taken independently with probability n−(1k−1h+ε)n^{-(\frac1k-\frac1h+\varepsilon)}. The expected RA,l(n)R_{A,l}(n) is shown to be ≪n−ε\ll n^{-\varepsilon} for every 2≤l≤h2\le l\le h: directly for l≤h/kl\le h/k, and for h/k<l≤hh/k<l\le h by a dyadic decomposition and Lemma 8 (p. 9), a weaker form of a lemma of Vu bounding the number of solutions of y1k+⋯+ylk=ny_1^k+\cdots+y_l^k=n in boxes for l≥h2(k)=O(8kk2)l\ge h_2(k)=O(8^kk^2). Lemma 6 (p. 5) then gives bounded RA,hR_{A,h}, and the expectation of A(x)A(x) gives the density.

Dependencies

Lemma 6 of the paper (p. 5) and Lemma 8 (p. 9), the latter from V. H. Vu, On a refinement of Waring's problem, Duke Math. J. 105 (2000), Lemma 2.1.

Bears on

  • Problem 158: none. The theorem concerns hh-fold sums for large hh, not sums of two elements; the paper does not mention the problem.