Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Theorem 1, p. 5, of Greg Martin and Kevin O'Bryant, Constructions of Generalized Sidon Sets, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 113 (2006), no. 4, 591-607, read in the arXiv edition arXiv:math/0408081v2 (21 Feb 2005) named on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the definitions it uses were read clause by clause on the page images; the proof (Section 3.1, p. 8) was read for structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Statement

Setting (pp. 1--3). For a set SS of integers, or of residues modulo nn, S∗S(k)S*S(k) is the number of ordered pairs (s1,s2)∈S×S(s_1,s_2)\in S\times S with s1+s2=ks_1+s_2=k, and ∥S∗∥∞=max⁡kS∗S(k)\lVert S^*\rVert_\infty=\max_k S*S(k) (p. 1); for subsets of Zn\mathbb Z_n the sums are taken modulo nn (p. 2). Then (equation (2), p. 3)

C(g,n)=max⁡{∣S∣:S⊆Zn, ∥S∗∥∞≤g}.C(g,n)=\max\{\lvert S\rvert : S\subseteq\mathbb Z_n,\ \lVert S^*\rVert_\infty\le g\}.

Because pairs are ordered, for a set of integers ∥S∗∥∞≤2\lVert S^*\rVert_\infty\le 2 is the Sidon condition, and ∥S∗∥∞≤2r\lVert S^*\rVert_\infty\le 2r says that each integer has at most rr representations a+ba+b with a≤ba\le b.

Theorem 1 (p. 5).

  • (i) (C(2,n)2)≤⌊n/2⌋\binom{C(2,n)}{2}\le\lfloor n/2\rfloor, and in particular C(2,n)≤n+1C(2,n)\le\sqrt n+1;
  • (ii) C(3,n)≤n+9/2+3C(3,n)\le\sqrt{n+9/2}+3;
  • (iii) C(4,n)≤3n+7/6C(4,n)\le\sqrt{3n}+7/6;
  • (iv) C(g,n)≤gnC(g,n)\le\sqrt{gn} for even gg;
  • (v) C(g,n)≤1−1/g gn+1C(g,n)\le\sqrt{1-1/g}\,\sqrt{gn}+1 for odd gg.

The paper notes that the bound of part (i) is attained for n=p2+p+1n=p^2+p+1 with pp prime, by Theorem 2(iii) (p. 8), and calls part (iii) the interesting contribution (p. 8).

Proof pointer

Section 3.1 (p. 8). Parts (i) and (ii) map pairs of distinct elements to their differences ±(s1−s2)\pm(s_1-s_2) modulo nn, which are distinct for a Sidon set and distinct after discarding one pair per element when ∥S∗∥∞=3\lVert S^*\rVert_\infty=3. Part (iii), after an idea the paper credits to Cilleruelo, compares the number of solutions of s1−s2≡s3−s4s_1-s_2\equiv s_3-s_4, bounded below by Cauchy-Schwarz over the difference counts, with the number of coincident sums, bounded above using ∥S∗∥∞≤4\lVert S^*\rVert_\infty\le4. Parts (iv) and (v) count the ∣S∣2\lvert S\rvert^2 ordered pairs against the nn residues; for odd gg a sum can occur an odd number of times only when it is twice an element of SS.

Dependencies

None beyond counting and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

Bears on

  • Problem 158: the problem's sets are those with ∥S∗∥∞≤4\lVert S^*\rVert_\infty\le4, and part (iii) bounds the size of such a set modulo nn by 3n+7/6\sqrt{3n}+7/6. It concerns residues modulo nn, not a subset of the integers, and says nothing about the lower limit of ∣A∩{1,…,N}∣/N1/2\lvert A\cap\{1,\ldots,N\}\rvert/N^{1/2} for an infinite set.