Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Sign sums are counted with multiplicity, as on the Lemma 2 page.

Proposition 3 (p. 156). For each dimension d≥1d\ge1 there are arbitrarily large nn for which unit vectors v1,…,vn∈Rdv_1,\ldots,v_n\in\mathbb R^d can be chosen so that only O(2n/nd/2)O(2^n/n^{d/2}) of their sign sums have norm d\sqrt d and none has smaller norm.

The dimension is regarded as fixed, so the implied constant may depend on dd. The paper concludes (p. 156) that for d>2d>2 far fewer than Ω(2n/n)\Omega(2^n/n) sign sums have norm at most d\sqrt d, which refutes the first reformulation with radius d\sqrt d and rate Ω(2n/n)\Omega(2^n/n). It further asserts, as a straightforward extension of the estimate and without proof, that for d>2d>2 no radius RdR_d independent of nn makes Ω(2n/n)\Omega(2^n/n) sign sums have norm at most RdR_d.

Proof pointer

P. 156. Take mm odd, n=dmn=dm, and mm copies of each of dd orthonormal vectors. By Lemma 2 no sign sum has norm below d\sqrt d; one of norm exactly d\sqrt d has every coordinate equal to ±1\pm1, and for each coordinate the number of sign choices doing this is 2(m⌊m/2⌋)=O(2m/m)2\binom{m}{\lfloor m/2\rfloor}=O(2^m/\sqrt m) by Stirling's formula. Multiplying over the dd coordinates gives O(2dm/md/2)=O(dd/22n/nd/2)O(2^{dm}/m^{d/2})=O(d^{d/2}2^n/n^{d/2}).

Dependencies

Lemma 2.

Source. Proposition 3, p. 156, of W. Carnielli and P. K. Carolino, Adjusting a conjecture of Erdős, Contrib. Discrete Math. 6 (2011), no. 1, 154--159, as identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the remarks after it were read clause by clause on the print, p. 156, and the counting proof was followed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on

  • Problem 395: the case d=2d=2 gives, for arbitrarily large even nn, unit vectors in the plane with only O(2n/n)O(2^n/n) sign sums of norm at most 2\sqrt2, so the order 2n/n2^n/n asked for in the problem cannot be raised for all configurations. The paper notes that d=2d=2 is the only dimension in which the rate Ω(2n/n)\Omega(2^n/n) is kept (p. 156). It proves no lower bound.