Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Theorem 1, p. 2, proof pp. 4--5, of P. Chojecki, A note on an Erdős path problem for transcendental entire functions, note, ulam.ai, 2026, 7 pp., the edition named on the source card.

Statement

Setting (pp. 1--2). M(r,f)=max⁡∣z∣=r∣f(z)∣M(r,f)=\max_{\lvert z\rvert=r}\lvert f(z)\rvert is the maximum modulus. A path to infinity is a continuous map γ:[0,∞)→C\gamma:[0,\infty)\to\mathbb C with ∣γ(t)∣→∞\lvert\gamma(t)\rvert\to\infty as t→∞t\to\infty. For R>0R>0 the note sets tR=inf⁡{t≥0:∣γ(t)∣=R}t_R=\inf\{t\ge0:\lvert\gamma(t)\rvert=R\}, the first time the path reaches the circle of radius RR, finite for all sufficiently large RR, and writes ℓγ(R)\ell_\gamma(R) for the length of the initial segment γ([0,tR])\gamma([0,t_R]). Since every path to infinity has infinite total length, the note reads Erdős's second question as a question about these initial segments (p. 2).

Theorem 1 (p. 2). Let ff be a transcendental entire function. Then some path to infinity γ\gamma satisfies

log⁡∣f(γ(t))∣log⁡∣γ(t)∣→∞(t→∞).\frac{\log\lvert f(\gamma(t))\rvert}{\log\lvert\gamma(t)\rvert}\to\infty \qquad(t\to\infty).

In particular ∣f(γ(t))/γ(t)n∣→∞\lvert f(\gamma(t))/\gamma(t)^n\rvert\to\infty as t→∞t\to\infty for every fixed n∈Nn\in\mathbb N. Moreover, the same path satisfies

ℓγ(R)=O(M(R,f)ε)(R→∞)\ell_\gamma(R)=O\bigl(M(R,f)^{\varepsilon}\bigr)\qquad(R\to\infty)

for every ε>0\varepsilon>0.

One path serves every nn and every ε\varepsilon at once; the constant in the OO depends on ε\varepsilon.

Proof pointer

Pp. 4--5. The proof applies the note's Theorem 4, which quotes Theorem B of J.-M. Wu, Length of paths for subharmonic functions, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 32 (1985): for a subharmonic uu on C\mathbb C with sup⁡∣z∣=ru(z)/log⁡r→∞\sup_{\lvert z\rvert=r}u(z)/\log r\to\infty, there is a path to infinity along which u(γ(t))/log⁡∣γ(t)∣→∞u(\gamma(t))/\log\lvert\gamma(t)\rvert\to\infty and ∫γe−δu∣dz∣<∞\int_\gamma e^{-\delta u}\lvert dz\rvert<\infty for every δ>0\delta>0, one path for all δ\delta. The note takes u=max⁡{log⁡∣f∣,−1}u=\max\{\log\lvert f\rvert,-1\}, whose circle maximum is max⁡{log⁡M(r,f),−1}\max\{\log M(r,f),-1\}; Lemma 3 (p. 3), that M(r,F)/rα→∞M(r,F)/r^\alpha\to\infty for every transcendental entire FF and every α>0\alpha>0 (from Cauchy's estimate for a nonzero Taylor coefficient of index above α\alpha), supplies the hypothesis. Along the path uu eventually equals log⁡∣f∣\log\lvert f\rvert, which gives the first assertion, and the bound log⁡∣f(γ(t))∣>(n+1)log⁡∣γ(t)∣\log\lvert f(\gamma(t))\rvert>(n+1)\log\lvert\gamma(t)\rvert for large tt gives the second. For the length, the initial segment lies in the closed disk of radius RR, where uu is at most its maximum on the circle of radius RR, so inserting eεue−εue^{\varepsilon u}e^{-\varepsilon u} into the length integral bounds ℓγ(R)\ell_\gamma(R) by eεmax⁡{log⁡M(R,f),−1}e^{\varepsilon\max\{\log M(R,f),-1\}} times the finite integral of e−εue^{-\varepsilon u} along γ\gamma.

Remark 5 (p. 5) adds that along the same path ∫γ∣f(z)∣−δ∣dz∣<∞\int_\gamma\lvert f(z)\rvert^{-\delta}\lvert dz\rvert<\infty for every δ>0\delta>0 once an initial compact subarc is deleted.

Read depth

Claims checked: the setting, Theorem 1, Lemma 3 and the proof on pp. 4--5 were read clause by clause on the page images of the note. Wu's Theorem B is quoted, not proved, in the note and was not checked against Wu's paper. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

  • Lemma 3 (p. 3): M(r,F)/rα→∞M(r,F)/r^\alpha\to\infty for transcendental entire FF and every α>0\alpha>0.
  • Theorem 4 (p. 3), quoting Theorem B of J.-M. Wu, Length of paths for subharmonic functions, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 32 (1985), no. 3, 497--505, which the note says builds on J. L. Lewis, J. Rossi and A. Weitsman, On the growth of subharmonic functions along paths, Ark. Mat. 22 (1984), 109--119.

Bears on

  • Problem 514: the first assertion is a path along which ∣f(z)/zn∣→∞\lvert f(z)/z^n\rvert\to\infty for every nn, the problem's first question answered yes for every transcendental entire ff; the note says (p. 2) that this existence part is implicit in Lewis, Rossi and Weitsman and stated by Wu. The length bound answers the second question yes in the note's reading of it, by initial segments: ℓγ(R)=O(M(R,f)ε)\ell_\gamma(R)=O(M(R,f)^\varepsilon) for every ε>0\varepsilon>0. The problem's claim page records the claim and its standing.