Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Theorem 1, p. 2, proof pp. 4--5, of P. Chojecki, A note on an Erdős path problem for transcendental entire functions, note, ulam.ai, 2026, 7 pp., the edition named on the source card.
Statement
Setting (pp. 1--2). is the maximum modulus. A path to infinity is a continuous map with as . For the note sets , the first time the path reaches the circle of radius , finite for all sufficiently large , and writes for the length of the initial segment . Since every path to infinity has infinite total length, the note reads Erdős's second question as a question about these initial segments (p. 2).
Theorem 1 (p. 2). Let be a transcendental entire function. Then some path to infinity satisfies
In particular as for every fixed . Moreover, the same path satisfies
for every .
One path serves every and every at once; the constant in the depends on .
Proof pointer
Pp. 4--5. The proof applies the note's Theorem 4, which quotes Theorem B of J.-M. Wu, Length of paths for subharmonic functions, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 32 (1985): for a subharmonic on with , there is a path to infinity along which and for every , one path for all . The note takes , whose circle maximum is ; Lemma 3 (p. 3), that for every transcendental entire and every (from Cauchy's estimate for a nonzero Taylor coefficient of index above ), supplies the hypothesis. Along the path eventually equals , which gives the first assertion, and the bound for large gives the second. For the length, the initial segment lies in the closed disk of radius , where is at most its maximum on the circle of radius , so inserting into the length integral bounds by times the finite integral of along .
Remark 5 (p. 5) adds that along the same path for every once an initial compact subarc is deleted.
Read depth
Claims checked: the setting, Theorem 1, Lemma 3 and the proof on pp. 4--5 were read clause by clause on the page images of the note. Wu's Theorem B is quoted, not proved, in the note and was not checked against Wu's paper. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
- Lemma 3 (p. 3): for transcendental entire and every .
- Theorem 4 (p. 3), quoting Theorem B of J.-M. Wu, Length of paths for subharmonic functions, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 32 (1985), no. 3, 497--505, which the note says builds on J. L. Lewis, J. Rossi and A. Weitsman, On the growth of subharmonic functions along paths, Ark. Mat. 22 (1984), 109--119.
Bears on
- Problem 514: the first assertion is a path along which for every , the problem's first question answered yes for every transcendental entire ; the note says (p. 2) that this existence part is implicit in Lewis, Rossi and Weitsman and stated by Wu. The length bound answers the second question yes in the note's reading of it, by initial segments: for every . The problem's claim page records the claim and its standing.