Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Hartman's theorem (Section 3)


Source. Sections 1 and 3, printed pp. 59--61 (PDF pp. 1--3). De Bruijn attributes the original result to S. Hartman, A remark about Cauchy's equation, Colloquium Mathematicum 8 (1961), 77--79.

Statement. Let S⊆RS\subseteq\mathbb R have Lebesgue measure zero. If f:R→Rf:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R satisfies

f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)

for every x,y∉Sx,y\notin S, then the same identity holds for every x,y∈Rx,y\in\mathbb R.

Proof. The equation can fail only on

(S×R)∪(R×S),(S\times\mathbb R)\cup(\mathbb R\times S),

which is a plane null set. By the main theorem, there is an additive function hh such that f=hf=h almost everywhere. Put k=f−hk=f-h, and let

T={x:k(x)≠0},U=S∪T.T=\{x:k(x)\ne0\},\qquad U=S\cup T.

The set UU is null. Fix a∈Ra\in\mathbb R. Since U∪(a−U)U\cup(a-U) is null, choose a1a_1 outside it and put a2=a−a1a_2=a-a_1. Then a1,a2∉Ua_1,a_2\notin U. In particular, a1,a2∉Sa_1,a_2\notin S, so the assumed equation gives

f(a)=f(a1)+f(a2).f(a)=f(a_1)+f(a_2).

Because hh is additive,

k(a)=k(a1)+k(a2).k(a)=k(a_1)+k(a_2).

Both terms on the right vanish since a1,a2∉Ta_1,a_2\notin T. Therefore k(a)=0k(a)=0. As aa was arbitrary, f=hf=h everywhere, and ff is additive everywhere. □\square

Dependencies. [[analysis/debruijn_1966_almost_additive_functions/main_theorem|Main theorem (Section 2)]].

Bears on. #1126