Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

With the Section 1 definitions (Mnr(a)M_n^r(a) the largest sum of rr consecutive intervals cut by a1,…,ana_1,\ldots,a_n on the circle of circumference 11, Λr(a)=lim sup⁡nnMnr(a)\Lambda_r(a)=\limsup_n nM_n^r(a)), for every sequence aa and every integer r≥1r\ge1:

Λr(a) ≥ 1log⁡(1+1/r) > r.\Lambda_r(a)\ \ge\ \frac1{\log(1+1/r)}\ >\ r .

The display is the last one of Section 3 and carries no number on the page; Section 6 refers to it as (3.3). Taking the infimum over sequences, Λr≥1/log⁡(1+1/r)\Lambda_r\ge1/\log(1+1/r), the bound the site quotes. For r=1r=1 it gives Λ1≥1/log⁡2\Lambda_1\ge1/\log2, attained by the Section 2 sequence.

Source. N. G. de Bruijn and P. Erdős, Sequences of points on a circle, Proc. 52 (1949), 14--17; Section 3 on printed p. 15 (PDF p. 3 of the TU/e portal PDF), read on the page image. The edition read is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the display and its hypotheses were read clause by clause on the page image; the proof was read for its structure and not checked.

Proof pointer

Section 3 proves the r=1r=1 case in full and says the general case is proved "similarly". For r=1r=1: suppose kMk1(a)<ϱkM_k^1(a)<\varrho for all kk with n≤k<2nn\le k<2n, display (3.1) (the page prints kMn1(a)<ϱkM_n^1(a)<\varrho, a misprint for Mk1M_k^1: the sum the page draws from (3.1) and (3.2) and its conclusion "for at least one kk" both need Mk1M_k^1). Order the nn intervals cut by a1,…,ana_1,\ldots,a_n by decreasing length α1≥⋯≥αn\alpha_1\ge\cdots\ge\alpha_n, with α1+⋯+αn=1\alpha_1+\cdots+\alpha_n=1 (3.2). Each of the points an+1,…,a2n−1a_{n+1},\ldots,a_{2n-1} splits at most one interval, so after p−1p-1 of them have been placed some interval of length at least αp\alpha_p is still intact, whence Mn+p−11(a)≥αpM_{n+p-1}^1(a)\ge\alpha_p for 1≤p≤n1\le p\le n. Summing (3.1) over these kk gives ϱ (1/n+1/(n+1)+⋯+1/(2n−1))>1\varrho\,(1/n+1/(n+1)+\cdots+1/(2n-1))>1. Hence for at least one kk in [n,2n)[n,2n),

kMk1(a) ≥ σn:=(1n+⋯+12n−1)−1,kM_k^1(a)\ \ge\ \sigma_n:=\Bigl(\frac1n+\cdots+\frac1{2n-1}\Bigr)^{-1},

and σn<1/log⁡2\sigma_n<1/\log2, σn→1/log⁡2\sigma_n\to1/\log2, so Λ1(a)≥1/log⁡2\Lambda_1(a)\ge1/\log2. For general rr the same count, started at stage rnrn and run over the points arn+1,…,arn+n−1a_{rn+1},\ldots,a_{rn+n-1}, gives, for at least one kk with rn≤k<(r+1)nrn\le k<(r+1)n, kMkr(a)≥(1/(rn)+1/(rn+1)+⋯+1/(rn+n−1))−1kM_k^r(a)\ge(1/(rn)+1/(rn+1)+\cdots+1/(rn+n-1))^{-1}, and the right side tends to 1/log⁡(1+1/r)1/\log(1+1/r) as n→∞n\to\infty. Since log⁡(1+1/r)<1/r\log(1+1/r)<1/r, the bound exceeds rr. The argument, with the general-rr case written out, is reconstructed (author-recorded, unreviewed) at its reconstruction page.

Mean-normalized form

An authored remark. The average rr-span is r/nr/n, so the natural normalization divides by rr. Since log⁡(1+1/r)=1/r−1/(2r2)+1/(3r3)−⋯\log(1+1/r)=1/r-1/(2r^2)+1/(3r^3)-\cdots,

1log⁡(1+1/r)=r+12−112r+O(r−2),\frac1{\log(1+1/r)}=r+\frac12-\frac1{12r}+O(r^{-2}),

so the bound reads Λr−r≥12−112r+O(r−2)\Lambda_r-r\ge\tfrac12-\tfrac1{12r}+O(r^{-2}), that is, r(Λr/r−1)≥12+o(1)r(\Lambda_r/r-1)\ge\tfrac12+o(1). This is the form in which the first expression of the Section 6 conjecture is a nontrivial question.

Dependencies

None beyond the Section 1 definitions.

Bears on

  • Problem 1221: the first of the three bounds the site quotes, and the reason the literal first expression r(Λr−1)r(\Lambda_r-1) of the problem is trivially unbounded: it is at least r(r−1)r(r-1).