Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (p. 2). A word is a finite string $A=A(0)A(1)\cdots A(a-1)\in\mathbb C^a$ with a∈Na\in\mathbb N. Definition 1 gives its aperiodic autocorrelation function on {0,1,…,a−1}\{0,1,\ldots,a-1\},

ΦA(n)=1a∑k=0a−1−nA(k)A(k+n)‾,\Phi_A(n)=\frac1a\sum_{k=0}^{a-1-n}A(k)\overline{A(k+n)},

and calls AA normalized when ΦA(0)=1\Phi_A(0)=1; every binary word, with entries ±1\pm1, is normalized. Definition 2 defines the merit factor of AA as 1/(2MA)1/(2M_A), where

MA=∑n=1a−1∣ΦA(n)∣2.M_A=\sum_{n=1}^{a-1}\lvert\Phi_A(n)\rvert^2 .

For a normalized word the paper sets

PA(z)=1a∑n=0a−1A(n)zn.P_A(z)=\frac1{\sqrt a}\sum_{n=0}^{a-1}A(n)z^n .

The norms ∥⋅∥p\lVert\cdot\rVert_p are those of LpL^p of the unit circle {∣z∣=1}\{\lvert z\rvert=1\} with normalized Haar measure (p. 2).

Lemma 0 (p. 2, quoted). "If AA is a normalized word then ∥PA∥2=1\lVert P_A\rVert_2=1 and 2MA=∥PA∥44−12M_A=\lVert P_A\rVert_4^4-1."

So for a normalized word the merit factor equals 1/(∥PA∥44−1)1/(\lVert P_A\rVert_4^4-1), and a sequence of normalized words has merit factors tending to infinity exactly when ∥PA∥4→1\lVert P_A\rVert_4\to1; the paper draws this reading on p. 3. A binary word of length a≥2a\ge2 has ∣ΦA(a−1)∣=1/a\lvert\Phi_A(a-1)\rvert=1/a, so MA>0M_A>0 and its merit factor is finite.

Source. T. Downarowicz and Y. Lacroix, "Merit factors and Morse sequences," Theoretical Computer Science 209 (1998), no. 1--2, 377--387, doi:10.1016/s0304-3975(98)00121-2: Definitions 1 and 2 and Lemma 0 with its proof on p. 2 of the authors' 10-page preprint identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: Definitions 1--2 and Lemma 0 were read clause by clause on the printed page. The proof is the short Parseval computation below and was followed.

Proof pointer

Page 2. Expanding ∣PA∣2\lvert P_A\rvert^2 gives a trigonometric polynomial whose coefficients at znz^n and z−nz^{-n}, 0≤n≤a−10\le n\le a-1, are ΦA(n)‾\overline{\Phi_A(n)} and ΦA(n)\Phi_A(n) (the print assigns them the other way round, which makes no difference for real words or for the norms); its constant term gives ∥PA∥22=ΦA(0)=1\lVert P_A\rVert_2^2=\Phi_A(0)=1. Applying Parseval to ∣PA∣2\lvert P_A\rvert^2 gives ∥PA∥44=1+2∑n=1a−1∣ΦA(n)∣2\lVert P_A\rVert_4^4=1+2\sum_{n=1}^{a-1}\lvert\Phi_A(n)\rvert^2.

Dependencies

None beyond Parseval's identity on the circle.

Bears on

  • Problem 1150: for a polynomial QQ of degree nn with coefficients ±1\pm1 and AA its coefficient word, PA=Q/n+1P_A=Q/\sqrt{n+1}, and the lemma reads ∥Q∥44/(n+1)2=1+2MA\lVert Q\rVert_4^4/(n+1)^2=1+2M_A. With ∥PA∥44≤∥PA∥∞2∥PA∥22\lVert P_A\rVert_4^4\le\lVert P_A\rVert_\infty^2\lVert P_A\rVert_2^2, a uniform bound MA≥δ>0M_A\ge\delta>0 over binary words would give max⁡∣z∣=1∣Q(z)∣≥(1+2δ)(n+1)\max_{\lvert z\rvert=1}\lvert Q(z)\rvert\ge\sqrt{(1+2\delta)(n+1)}, the problem's gap. The lemma itself proves no such bound; it is the identity that links merit factors to the problem's L∞L^\infty question, and the source card works the comparison out.