Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Erdős and Taylor (1960), printed pp. 138–139, equations (2.1), (2.5)–(2.8), in the canonical PDF.
Statement. Let be the symmetric nearest-neighbor walk on , starting at zero, with independent increments uniform on . Put
Then, as ,
All logarithms are natural. The source writes for avoidance through time ; thus . This indexing convention keeps the finite renewal identity below exact, including its final-time endpoint. The one-step shift does not change the stated asymptotic.
Proof. Write . Odd return probabilities vanish. For even times,
To see the exact expression, map coordinates to . Each step becomes a uniformly chosen pair in , so the two transformed walks are independent symmetric sign walks. Both are at zero after steps with the displayed probability. The estimate follows from Stirling's formula. Consequently
Partition paths according to their last visit to the origin by time . The increments after that visit are independent of the preceding path, giving
Since decreases in , (1) gives . Inverting the estimate for proves
For the lower bound, take a sufficiently large multiple of four and set
Then . Split (1) at and , use monotonicity on its first two parts, and use on its last part. This yields
The first sum is . The middle sum is , since and are both proportional to . Also , so (2) gives . The last sum has terms, each , and hence is . Rearranging (3) now gives
Changing to alters the main term by . Thus the desired lower bound holds at every sufficiently large even time. Monotonicity between consecutive even times gives it at odd times as well. Combining it with (2) proves the result.
Depends on. The elementary return count, the last-visit renewal identity, Stirling's formula, and harmonic-sum estimates. All probabilistic deductions used here are included above; no recurrence theorem is needed as an input.
Bears on. #1165: the first estimate of Hao, Li, Okada and Zheng, Lemma 2.1 is this equation, and the corpus records that lemma among the inputs to their Theorem 1.1, which answers the problem. #1166: the equation is the input to the planar maximum local time bound used in the recorded deduction for that problem.