Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. A. W. Goodman, On the convexity of the level curves of a polynomial, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (1966), no. 2, 358--361, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-1966-0188408-3, identified on the source card: section 2, "The first counterexample", p. 359, with the setting on p. 358.
Read depth. Claims checked: the example was read clause by clause on the page image, and , the critical points and the values (3) and (4) were recomputed here. The topological claims (the double points and the count of three components) are taken as printed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Statement
With the paper's notation (p. 358), is open and its boundary is the lemniscate .
Example (p. 359). Let (2). Then , with zeros and . Take (3). At this the curve has double points at and , and has three components, as many as has distinct roots ( and ). The component containing is not convex: and lie on its boundary, but their midpoint has (4), and , so lies outside the closure of .
The root is double, so is less than the degree ; the paper's Theorem (p. 361) gives a quartic with four simple roots.
Proof pointer
P. 359. Everything is direct computation: the factorization of , the values and , and the comparison . If were convex its closure would contain the segment from to , and so .
Dependencies
None; elementary computation.
Bears on
- Problem 1047: the example answers Grunsky's question no for the open set at the critical level . At that level the closed set of the problem contains the two double points, at which branches of the lemniscate cross, so its components are not those of and the example as printed does not answer the problem as posed.