Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Laczkovich (1984), Theorem 1, printed p. 109, and its deduction from Theorem 2 on p. 110 (PDF pp. 1–2).
Statement
If satisfies
then is nondecreasing. No measurability, continuity, or local boundedness hypothesis is required.
Dependencies. Theorem 2 and the bounded continued fraction of recorded in the classical input page. The preceding source-specific proof chain is part of this compilation; general continued-fraction theory is the stated external input.
Bears on. This is the affirmative real-function conclusion in Problem 1125. It does not assert strict increase or a theorem on arbitrary rational-domain functions.
Proof
Choose any real and define
For every real and , the original inequality applies with base point and positive step . Hence satisfies the same inequality. Restrict to and apply Theorem 2. Since ,
This proves nondecreasing monotonicity on all of .