Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. G. Pisier, Arithmetic characterizations of Sidon sets, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 8 (1983), no. 1, 87--89; the unnumbered Proposition on p. 88. The copy read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the remarks after it were read clause by clause on the print. The article contains no proof; nothing here is independently reviewed.

Statement

Proposition (p. 88). Let GG be a compact abelian group and Λ⊂G^\Lambda\subset\widehat G with 0∉Λ0\notin\Lambda, as in Theorem 1. The conditions (i)--(iv) of Theorem 1 are also equivalent to each of the following.

  • (v) There are numbers α>0\alpha>0 and ρ<1\rho<1 such that every finite A⊂ΛA\subset\Lambda satisfies
m({t∈G ∣ inf⁡λ∈ARe⁡λ(t)>ρ})≤2−α∣A∣.m\Bigl(\Bigl\{t\in G\ \Bigm|\ \inf_{\lambda\in A}\operatorname{Re}\lambda(t)>\rho\Bigr\}\Bigr) \le2^{-\alpha|A|}.
  • (vi) There is a number α>0\alpha>0 such that, for every finite A⊂ΛA\subset\Lambda, there are points t1,…,tN∈Gt_1,\dots,t_N\in G with N≥2α∣A∣N\ge2^{\alpha|A|} and sup⁡λ∈A∣λ(ti)−λ(tj)∣≥α\sup_{\lambda\in A}|\lambda(t_i)-\lambda(t_j)|\ge\alpha for all i≠ji\ne j.

The print writes mm without defining it on these pages; this page reads it as the Haar probability measure of GG.

Proof pointer

The article says the Proposition is proved in Pisier's "Condition d'entropie et caractérisations arithmétiques des ensembles de Sidon" (its reference [5], then to appear), that the equivalence of (v) and (vi) is formal, and that the implication (v) ⇒\Rightarrow (i) answers affirmatively Problem 8.3 of his "De nouvelles caractérisations des ensembles de Sidon" (reference [4], Advances in Math. Supplementary Studies 7B (1981), 685--726) (p. 88).

Dependencies

Pisier's references [4] and [5] above.

Bears on

  • Problem 774: context only. Through Theorem 2, (v) and (vi) are further equivalent forms of proportionate dissociation for infinite subsets of the positive integers; they decide nothing about the finite-union question.