Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Section 4, pp. 97-98, of Graeme L. Cohen and Herman J. J. te Riele, Iterating the Sum-of-Divisors Function, Experimental Mathematics 5 (1996), no. 2, 91-100, as identified on the source card. The paper gives the conjecture no number.

Statement

Setting (pp. 91-92, 97). Write σ0(n)=n\sigma^0(n)=n and σm(n)=σ(σm−1(n))\sigma^m(n)=\sigma(\sigma^{m-1}(n)) for m≥1m\ge1. Statement (vi) of the paper's list (p. 92), quoted from Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro (1990), reads: for any n1,n2>1n_1,n_2>1 there are m1,m2m_1,m_2 with σm1(n1)=σm2(n2)\sigma^{m_1}(n_1)=\sigma^{m_2}(n_2). The paper says it does not believe statement (vi) is true (p. 97).

Trees (p. 97). The paper calls a set of starting values a (π1,π2,π3)(\pi_1,\pi_2,\pi_3)-tree when π1\pi_1 is its smallest number and every sequence (σi(n))i≥1(\sigma^i(n))_{i\ge1} with π1≤n≤π2\pi_1\le n\le\pi_2 in it meets the sequence (σi(π1))i≥1(\sigma^i(\pi_1))_{i\ge1} while σi(n)<π3\sigma^i(n)<\pi_3. Fixing π2\pi_2 and π3\pi_3 determines the successive trees for all π1≤π2\pi_1\le\pi_2.

Computation (pp. 97-98). There are 21 (π1,200,10200)(\pi_1,200,10^{200})-trees, with

π1∈{2,5,16,19,27,29,33,49,50,52,66,81,85,105,146,147,163,170,189,197,199}.(4.2)\pi_1\in\{2,5,16,19,27,29,33,49,50,52,66,81,85,105,146,147,163,170,189,197,199\}. \qquad(4.2)

The paper computed (σi(n))(\sigma^i(n)) for each nn with 2≤n≤2002\le n\le200, grouped the sequences by whether the first term above 101010^{10} occurs in an earlier sequence, which gave 21 (π1,200,1010)(\pi_1,200,10^{10})-trees, and then compared the first terms above 1020010^{200}: the trees remained distinct. It also found 64 (π1,1000,10100)(\pi_1,1000,10^{100})-trees.

Conjecture (p. 98). The 21 trees for π2=200\pi_2=200 remain distinct as π3→∞\pi_3\to\infty; in the paper's words, "we conjecture that this will stay true as π3→∞\pi_3\to\infty".

Related observation (p. 97). Writing n1,n2n_1,n_2 for n,tnn,tn in Theorem 3.1, the paper notes that any pair with n1k~(n1)=n2k~(n2)n_1\widetilde k(n_1)=n_2\widetilde k(n_2) (4.1) gives σm1(n1)=σm2(n2)\sigma^{m_1}(n_1)=\sigma^{m_2}(n_2) with mi=m~(ni)m_i=\widetilde m(n_i), and lists nine such pairs from Table 2 in which n2n_2 is not a multiple of n1n_1: (7,24)(7,24), (9,168)(9,168), (10,12)(10,12), (14,24)(14,24), (18,120)(18,120), (36,168)(36,168), (62,96)(62,96), (72,336)(72,336) and (341,384)(341,384).

Proof pointer

None: the conjecture is supported only by the computation, which this page has not rerun.

Dependencies

The paper's computation of the sequences (σi(n))(\sigma^i(n)) for 2≤n≤2002\le n\le200 up to 1020010^{200}. Read depth: claims checked; the definitions, the computation report and the conjecture were read on pp. 97-98.

Bears on

  • Problem 412: statement (vi) is the problem's question. The conjecture, if true, would give pairs such as n1=2n_1=2, n2=5n_2=5, roots of different trees, with σm1(n1)≠σm2(n2)\sigma^{m_1}(n_1)\ne\sigma^{m_2}(n_2) for all m1,m2≥1m_1,m_2\ge1, a negative answer. The paper establishes only that the trees do not meet below 1020010^{200}, which decides nothing.