Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Section 4, pp. 97-98, of Graeme L. Cohen and Herman J. J. te Riele, Iterating the Sum-of-Divisors Function, Experimental Mathematics 5 (1996), no. 2, 91-100, as identified on the source card. The paper gives the conjecture no number.
Statement
Setting (pp. 91-92, 97). Write and for . Statement (vi) of the paper's list (p. 92), quoted from Erdős, Granville, Pomerance and Spiro (1990), reads: for any there are with . The paper says it does not believe statement (vi) is true (p. 97).
Trees (p. 97). The paper calls a set of starting values a -tree when is its smallest number and every sequence with in it meets the sequence while . Fixing and determines the successive trees for all .
Computation (pp. 97-98). There are 21 -trees, with
The paper computed for each with , grouped the sequences by whether the first term above occurs in an earlier sequence, which gave 21 -trees, and then compared the first terms above : the trees remained distinct. It also found 64 -trees.
Conjecture (p. 98). The 21 trees for remain distinct as ; in the paper's words, "we conjecture that this will stay true as ".
Related observation (p. 97). Writing for in Theorem 3.1, the paper notes that any pair with (4.1) gives with , and lists nine such pairs from Table 2 in which is not a multiple of : , , , , , , , and .
Proof pointer
None: the conjecture is supported only by the computation, which this page has not rerun.
Dependencies
The paper's computation of the sequences for up to . Read depth: claims checked; the definitions, the computation report and the conjecture were read on pp. 97-98.
Bears on
- Problem 412: statement (vi) is the problem's question. The conjecture, if true, would give pairs such as , , roots of different trees, with for all , a negative answer. The paper establishes only that the trees do not meet below , which decides nothing.