Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Theorem 1.1, p. 2, proved in Section 3 on pp. 3--6, of Carl Pomerance, On amicable numbers, Analytic Number Theory: In Honor of Helmut Maier's 60th Birthday, Springer (2015), 321--327, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22240-0_19, as identified on the source card. Labels and pages are those of the author's manuscript named there (pp. 1--7).

Statement

Notation (pp. 1--2). σ\sigma is the sum-of-divisors function and s(n)=σ(n)−ns(n)=\sigma(n)-n. Two different positive integers a,ba,b with s(a)=bs(a)=b and s(b)=as(b)=a form an amicable pair; a positive integer is amicable if it belongs to an amicable pair. A\mathcal{A} is the set of amicable numbers and A(x)=A∩[1,x]\mathcal{A}(x)=\mathcal{A}\cap[1,x].

Theorem 1.1 (p. 2, quoted). "As x→∞x\to\infty, we have"

#A(x)≤x/exp⁡((12+o(1))log⁡xlog⁡log⁡log⁡x).\#\mathcal{A}(x)\le x/\exp\Bigl(\bigl(\tfrac12+o(1)\bigr)\sqrt{\log x\log\log\log x}\Bigr).

Since log⁡log⁡log⁡x→∞\log\log\log x\to\infty, this gives #A(x)≤x/elog⁡x\#\mathcal{A}(x)\le x/e^{\sqrt{\log x}} for all sufficiently large xx, the form stated in the abstract (p. 1). The paper presents the theorem as replacing the exponent 1/31/3 in the earlier bound x/exp⁡((log⁡x)1/3)x/\exp((\log x)^{1/3}) of Pomerance's 1981 paper (its reference [15]) by 1/21/2 (p. 2).

Proof pointer

Section 3, pp. 3--6. With L=exp⁡(12log⁡xlog⁡log⁡log⁡x)L=\exp\bigl(\tfrac12\sqrt{\log x\log\log\log x}\bigr), the proof discards, in steps (i)--(vii), sets of n∈A(x)n\in\mathcal{A}(x) of size at most x/L1+o(1)x/L^{1+o(1)}: those with nn or s(n)s(n) small, with a large L2L^2-smooth divisor or a large squarefull divisor, with a prime above LL dividing gcd⁡(n,s(n))\gcd(n,s(n)), with small cofactors m,m′m,m' of the largest primes p,p′p,p' of n=pmn=pm and s(n)=p′m′s(n)=p'm', with pp or p′p' above x3/4Lx^{3/4}L (the new case, treated through a congruence modulo σ(D)\sigma(D) for a suitable divisor DD of s(n)s(n)), and with P(σ(m1))≤LP(\sigma(m_1))\le L for the largest squarefree unitary divisor m1m_1 of mm (or likewise m1′m_1' of m′m'), which Lemma 2.1 controls. For the remaining nn, a prime r>Lr>L dividing σ(m1)\sigma(m_1) must also divide σ(ℓj)\sigma(\ell^j) for a prime power ℓj\ell^j dividing s(n)s(n), and summing over r,q,ℓj,m,pr,q,\ell^j,m,p gives O(x(log⁡x)5log⁡log⁡x/L)O(x(\log x)^5\log\log x/L) (p. 6).

Dependencies

Lemma 2.1; de Bruijn's bound for smooth numbers (reference [3]); the elementary inequality (1), p. 4, taken from the proofs of [11, Lemma 3.6] and [12, Lemma 3.3]. Read depth: claims checked; the statement was read clause by clause on p. 2, the proof for its structure on pp. 3--6.

Bears on

  • #830: each amicable pair a<b≤xa<b\le x is determined by its smaller member a∈A(x)a\in\mathcal{A}(x), so the theorem bounds from above the number of pairs with a<ba<b that the problem's A(x)A(x) counts. The problem's condition a≤ba\le b also admits a=ba=b, that is perfect numbers, which the paper does not count. The bound is of the form x1−o(1)x^{1-o(1)}, so it is consistent with the conjectured A(x)>x1−o(1)A(x)>x^{1-o(1)}; the paper answers neither question of the problem and notes that the infinitude of amicable pairs is unproved (p. 1).