Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Lemma 4, printed p. 88 (PDF p. 4).
Statement. Fix . Suppose a family of distinct integers at most has , and at least of its members have a proper divisor such that all prime factors of exceed . Then, for all sufficiently large , there is one integer corresponding in this sense to more than
members of the family.
Full proof
For each qualifying member choose one such divisor, for example the least. Let count the members assigned to . These assignments are finite, , and .
If every were at most , then, writing ,
for all sufficiently large , a contradiction. Therefore one is strictly greater than the required threshold. Every assigned divisor retains the prime-gap property.
Source precision. The sentence before the source's summation must be read as existence of at least one witness divisor for each of the qualifying integers. A single divisor common to many members is the conclusion of the summation, not an assumption. Choosing one witness per integer makes the counting unambiguous.
Use. The upper proof of Theorem 2 applies this after Lemma 3 has discarded exceptions.