Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source: published version, p. 239, Section 2.1 through equation (12).

Construction

Let H\mathcal H be an ℓ\ell-bounded hypergraph on a finite set XX, and fix W⊆XW\subseteq X. For S∈HS\in\mathcal H, consider all S′∈HS'\in\mathcal H satisfying

S′⊆W∪S.S'\subseteq W\cup S.

This collection is nonempty because it contains SS. Choose an S′S' for which ∣S′∖W∣|S'\setminus W| is smallest, breaking ties by a fixed deterministic order on H\mathcal H, and define

T(S,W)=S′∖W,t(S,W)=∣T(S,W)∣.T(S,W)=S'\setminus W, \qquad t(S,W)=|T(S,W)|.

The set T(S,W)T(S,W) is a minimum (S,W)(S,W)-fragment. Since S′⊆W∪SS'\subseteq W\cup S, deleting WW also shows

T(S,W)⊆S,T(S,W)∩W=∅.(1)T(S,W)\subseteq S, \qquad T(S,W)\cap W=\varnothing. \tag{1}

Define

G(W)={S∈H:t(S,W)≥0.9ℓ},U(W)={T(S,W):S∈G(W)},H′(W)={T(S,W):S∈H∖G(W)}.(2)\begin{aligned} \mathcal G(W) &=\{S\in\mathcal H:t(S,W)\ge0.9\ell\},\\ \mathcal U(W) &=\{T(S,W):S\in\mathcal G(W)\},\\ \mathcal H'(W) &=\{T(S,W):S\in\mathcal H\setminus\mathcal G(W)\}. \end{aligned} \tag{2}

Exact covering and contraction properties

By (1), each fragment used in U(W)\mathcal U(W) is a subset of the edge that produced it. Hence

G(W)⊆⟨U(W)⟩.(3)\mathcal G(W)\subseteq\langle\mathcal U(W)\rangle. \tag{3}

Likewise every S∈H∖G(W)S\in\mathcal H\setminus\mathcal G(W) contains its fragment, so

H∖G(W)⊆⟨H′(W)⟩.(4)\mathcal H\setminus\mathcal G(W) \subseteq\langle\mathcal H'(W)\rangle. \tag{4}

For such an SS, the integer t(S,W)t(S,W) is strictly less than 0.9ℓ0.9\ell. Therefore every edge of H′(W)\mathcal H'(W) has size at most 0.9ℓ0.9\ell (and in fact has integer size strictly below that real cutoff). Thus (2) separates a part of H\mathcal H covered by U(W)\mathcal U(W) from a residual hypergraph whose edge-size bound contracts by the required factor.

Finally, if T(S,W)=S′∖WT(S,W)=S'\setminus W, then

W∪T(S,W)⊇S′.(5)W\cup T(S,W)\supseteq S'. \tag{5}

This retained witness S′∈HS'\in\mathcal H is what propagates membership in the original up-set during the iteration.

The expected cost of U(W)\mathcal U(W) is bounded in Lemma 2.1.