Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. “The Generating Theorem,” PDF pp. 1--2 of the author survey. The survey identifies it as Theorem 1 of Zhi-Wei Sun, Systems of congruences with multipliers, Nanjing Univ. J. Math. Biquarterly 6 (1989), no. 1, 124--133.

Conventions

Let MM be an additive commutative monoid, let Λ⊆M\Lambda\subseteq M, and let

A={(λs,as,ns)}s=1k,0≤as<ns,A=\{(\lambda_s,a_s,n_s)\}_{s=1}^k, \qquad 0\leq a_s<n_s,

be a finite system in which λs∈Λ\lambda_s\in\Lambda weights the residue class as+nsZa_s+n_s\mathbb Z. Its covering map is

wA(x)=∑s=1kλsχs(x),w_A(x)=\sum_{s=1}^k\lambda_s\chi_s(x),

where χs(x)=1\chi_s(x)=1 when x∈as+nsZx\in a_s+n_s\mathbb Z and is 00 otherwise. The sum-system A⊔BA\sqcup B retains all triples, including repetitions. For S⊆MS\subseteq M, let S∗S_* be the class of systems AA with wA(Z)⊆Sw_A(\mathbb Z)\subseteq S, and write

R(q)={0,1,…,q−1}.R(q)=\{0,1,\ldots,q-1\}.

Statement

All systems in S∗S_* are generated by the following two operations.

  1. If λ1,…,λk∈Λ\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_k\in\Lambda and λ1+⋯+λk∈S\lambda_1+\cdots+\lambda_k\in S, then
{(λs,0,1)}s=1k∈S∗.\{(\lambda_s,0,1)\}_{s=1}^k\in S_*.
  1. Let qq be prime. For every r∈R(q)r\in R(q), suppose
Ar={(λs,asr,ns)}s=1k⊔{(λj(r),aj(r),nj(r))}j=1h(r)∈S∗,A_r= \{(\lambda_s,a_{sr},n_s)\}_{s=1}^k \sqcup \{(\lambda_j^{(r)},a_j^{(r)},n_j^{(r)})\}_{j=1}^{h(r)} \in S_*,

with max⁡r∈R(q)h(r)>0\max_{r\in R(q)}h(r)>0. Suppose also that every nsn_s is coprime to qq and, for each ss, there is a unique as∈R(ns)a_s\in R(n_s) satisfying

as≡r+qasr(modns)for every r∈R(q).a_s\equiv r+q a_{sr}\pmod{n_s} \qquad\text{for every }r\in R(q).

Then

A={(λs,as,ns)}s=1k⊔⨆r=0q−1{(λj(r),r+qaj(r),qnj(r))}j=1h(r)A=\{(\lambda_s,a_s,n_s)\}_{s=1}^k \sqcup \bigsqcup_{r=0}^{q-1} \{(\lambda_j^{(r)},r+q a_j^{(r)},q n_j^{(r)})\}_{j=1}^{h(r)}

belongs to S∗S_*.

Proof scope. This is the survey's statement-level restatement of an earlier theorem. The 1989 primary paper and its proof were not acquired or independently checked here.