Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. The unnumbered Theorem on p. 2 of Wouter van Doorn and Anneroos R. F. Everts, Smooth sums with small spacings, arXiv:2511.04585v1 (6 November 2025), the edition identified on the source card; its proof runs from p. 2 to p. 7.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the definitions it uses were read clause by clause on the print, and the proof was read for its structure. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Statement

Setting (p. 2). Let p>1p>1 be an odd integer and let Ap=(a1,a2,…)A_p=(a_1,a_2,\ldots) be the increasing sequence of all integers 2xpy2^{x}p^{y} with x,y≥0x,y\ge0 integers. With log⁡2\log_2 the logarithm to base 2, put f0(x)=xf_0(x)=x, fk(x)=max⁡(1,⌊log⁡2fk−1(x)⌋)f_k(x)=\max\bigl(1,\lfloor\log_2f_{k-1}(x)\rfloor\bigr) for k≥1k\ge1, and F(x)=∏k≥0fk(x)F(x)=\prod_{k\ge0}f_k(x).

Theorem (p. 2).

  1. For every odd integer p>1p>1 there is a constant CpC_p such that every positive integer nn can be written as n=b1+b2+⋯+brn=b_1+b_2+\cdots+b_r with every bi∈Apb_i\in A_p and b1<b2<⋯<br<Cpb1b_1<b_2<\cdots<b_r<C_pb_1.
  2. In general one may take Cp=12F(4p)C_p=\tfrac12F(4p). If p−1p-1 is a power of two one may take Cp=2pC_p=2p, and if p+1p+1 is a power of two one may take Cp=2(p+1)C_p=2(p+1).
  3. No constant smaller than pp can replace CpC_p.

The case p=3p=3 (abstract, p. 1, and p. 2). Here p−1=2p-1=2, so C3=6C_3=6: every positive integer nn is a sum n=b1+⋯+brn=b_1+\cdots+b_r of distinct 3-smooth integers with 1≤b1<b2<⋯<br<6b11\le b_1<b_2<\cdots<b_r<6b_1. Part 3 says no constant below 33 works for the 3-smooth integers.

What the proof of part 3 establishes (pp. 2--3) is a density statement: call a sum of distinct elements of ApA_p with b1<⋯<br<Cb1b_1<\cdots<b_r<Cb_1 short; then for every constant CC with 1<C<p1<C<p, almost all positive integers are not short sums.

Proof pointer

Lower bound (pp. 2--3). Fix 1<C<p1<C<p and small δ,ϵ>0\delta,\epsilon>0 with C(1+ϵ)<p−δC(1+\epsilon)<p-\delta. Split by the interval [(1+ϵ)j,(1+ϵ)j+1)[(1+\epsilon)^j,(1+\epsilon)^{j+1}) that holds b1b_1; every summand of a short sum then lies in a window of ratio p−δp-\delta, and Lemma 1 (p. 3) bounds the number of elements of ApA_p in such a window. Summing the resulting bounds over jj shows that the number of short sums with all summands at most NN is at most 2cp(L+1)Nlog⁡(p−δ)/log⁡p2^{c_p}(L+1)N^{\log(p-\delta)/\log p} with L=⌊log⁡N/log⁡(1+ϵ)⌋L=\lfloor\log N/\log(1+\epsilon)\rfloor, which is small compared with NN.

Existence (pp. 3--7). Lemma 2 (p. 4) supplies a set S⊂Ap∖{1}S\subset A_p\setminus\{1\} whose subset sums cover ∣S∣+1\lvert S\rvert+1 consecutive integers starting at some M0≤pM_0\le p. Starting from a representation of nn with coefficients M0M_0 or M0+1M_0+1 on the smallest elements of ApA_p and a binary expansion of the remainder, a variant of the "midgame" procedure of Blecksmith, McCallum and Selfridge (the paper's reference [5]) lowers each coefficient in turn to 00 or 11 by raising coefficients of larger elements of ApA_p; Lemma 3 (p. 6) bounds the coefficients interval by interval, so all surviving summands lie in [am,Cpam)[a_m,C_pa_m) for CpC_p a product of factors uku_k fixed by SS and M0M_0. The special values 2p2p and 2(p+1)2(p+1) come from the choices S={2,p−1,p}S=\{2,p-1,p\} (a multiset when p=3p=3) and S={2,p,p+1}S=\{2,p,p+1\} (p. 7); the general bound 12F(4p)\tfrac12F(4p) is the computation at the end of p. 7.

Section 3 (p. 8) shows by example that multisets can lower CpC_p further for some pp, and leaves open whether a constant cc with Cp<cpC_p<cp for all odd p>1p>1 exists.

Dependencies

Lemma 1, which the paper draws from Lecture 5 of Hardy's Ramanujan (its reference [6]); Lemmas 2 and 3 of the paper; the procedure of Blecksmith, McCallum and Selfridge, 3-smooth representations of integers, Amer. Math. Monthly 105 (1998).

Bears on

  • Problem 845: the problem asks, for a constant CC, whether the integers b1+⋯+btb_1+\cdots+b_t with distinct bi=2ki3lib_i=2^{k_i}3^{l_i} and bt≤Cb1b_t\le Cb_1 have density 00. The case p=3p=3 gives every positive integer such a sum with bt<6b1b_t<6b_1, so for every C≥6C\ge6 the set is all positive integers. Part 3, at p=3p=3, shows that for every 1<C<31<C<3 almost all integers are not such sums with bt<Cb1b_t<Cb_1. The paper decides nothing for 3≤C<63\le C<6.