Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Suppose T=(A,B,π/3)T=(A,B,\pi/3) has incommensurable angles, A<BA<B, and 3tan⁡(A/2)∈Q\sqrt3\tan(A/2)\in\mathbb Q. Then TT admits a tiling by the triangle R=(α,β,γ)R=(\alpha,\beta,\gamma) with

α=A,β=π/3−A,γ=2π/3.\alpha=A,\qquad\beta=\pi/3-A,\qquad\gamma=2\pi/3.

Every tiling by this shape of tile uses a nonsquare number of tiles.

Source and scope. Beeson–Laczkovich–Zhang, arXiv:2604.03609v3, Proposition 26, p. 14, with Lemma 25, pp. 13–14. Complete rewritten proof using the external existence theorem stated below.

Proof

Since A+B=2π/3A+B=2\pi/3 and A<BA<B, we have 0<A<π/30<A<\pi/3, so RR is a nondegenerate triangle. Proposition 10 gives 3sin⁡α,cos⁡α∈Q\sqrt3\sin\alpha,\cos\alpha\in\mathbb Q. The external existence input is Laczkovich, Tilings of triangles (1995), Theorem 2.5: for α+β=π/3\alpha+\beta=\pi/3 with these rationality conditions, the triangle (α,α+2β,α+β)(\alpha,\alpha+2\beta,\alpha+\beta) can be tiled by congruent (α,β,2π/3)(\alpha,\beta,2\pi/3) triangles. This is TT.

Normalize the tile sides a,b,ca,b,c to positive integers. The cosine rule gives c2=a2+ab+b2c^2=a^2+ab+b^2. Lemma 25 is the identity

sin⁡(α+2β)=sin⁡α+sin⁡β.\sin(\alpha+2\beta)=\sin\alpha+\sin\beta.

Indeed α=π/3−β\alpha=\pi/3-\beta, so subtracting the addition formulas for sin⁡(π/3+β)\sin(\pi/3+\beta) and sin⁡(π/3−β)\sin(\pi/3-\beta) gives sin⁡β\sin\beta. This proves that lemma without relying on its optional geometric diagram.

The sine rule now shows that the sides of TT opposite (α,α+2β,α+β)(\alpha,\alpha+2\beta,\alpha+\beta) are proportional to (a,a+b,c)(a,a+b,c). Write them as (am,(a+b)m,cm)(am,(a+b)m,cm). Boundary sides are integers, so m>0m>0 is rational. Division of areas gives

N=am(a+b)msin⁡(π/3)absin⁡(2π/3)=a+bbm2.N=\frac{am(a+b)m\sin(\pi/3)}{ab\sin(2\pi/3)} =\frac{a+b}{b}m^2.

If NN were square, b(a+b)b(a+b) would be a rational square, hence an integer square. Apply Proposition 19 with the roles of a,ba,b interchanged: this is incompatible with c2=a2+ab+b2c^2=a^2+ab+b^2.

Dependencies. Proposition 10, Proposition 19, and the cited external existence theorem. The proof of Laczkovich's theorem is not reproduced here.

Bears on. Problem 633.