Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source: published paper, printed p. 221, the random-selection construction, continued on p. 222.
Statement
Let , , and take the maximal -net in from the conventions. Independently include each center in with probability . Retain
Color all lifted closed Voronoi cells of red and everything else blue. This periodic coloring has no red pair at distance one. Every center has probability greater than of belonging to .
If a nonempty Euclidean configuration of diameter at most has pairwise distances at least five, then its containing-cell centers correspond to mutually independent -membership events. Consequently, for any fixed realizable assignment of its points to cells, the probability that all assigned centers lie outside is less than .
Full proof
By Lemma 2.2, a torus ball of radius contains at most net points. One can choose nearest lifts in that ball, which remain -separated. Independence of the original selections gives
For , Bernoulli's inequality bounds the last power below by . For , the exact integer inequality gives .
Two red points in the same lifted cell are at distance at most . Points in different translates of the same cell have distance at least . For two different torus centers, red points at distance one would give center distance at most in the quotient. The selection rule forbids retaining both centers. These cases also cover all cell boundaries, which were included in red.
Now take containing-cell centers for the configuration in the statement. Because each cell lies within of its center,
For every nonzero ,
The unshifted distance is also greater than . Hence their quotient distances exceed , and their closed radius- neighborhoods of Bernoulli variables are pairwise disjoint. Each event is a function only of the variables in its own neighborhood. The events are therefore mutually independent, not merely pairwise independent. Thus
Why the period is changed
The source uses period and infers independence from the displayed bounds on the lifted centers. Those bounds do not exclude overlap of the neighborhoods modulo . For example, on the one-dimensional torus of length , take . The centers and have large lifted distance but quotient distance three. Their radius- neighborhoods share the centers and . Their retention events are positively correlated: each depends on avoiding these same selected neighbors, while neither center is itself in the other center's exclusion neighborhood.
This can occur under the theorem's hypotheses, not just for a tiny test configuration. Take and the maximum-cardinality five-separated subset
It has points and contains the two centers in question. The hypothesis holds because and .
The period supplies the missing neighborhood separation. The main proof and constant-bounds page retain the original threshold with this larger period. This is a compilation-supplied repair, not an author-issued correction or a counterexample to the theorem.
Related proof pages. definitions, lemma 2 2, constant bounds, theorem 1 2.
Bears on. Problem 188.