Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Problem 36, pp. 102--103, of P. Erdős, Research problems, Period. Math. Hungar. 15 (1984), no. 1, 101--103, doi:10.1007/BF02109375. The edition read is named on the source card.
Statement
Setting (p. 101). is a set of points in the plane; property means that no line contains more than of its points (conjecture (1)).
Theorem (pp. 102--103, quoted). "I conjectured and Beck proved [1] that there is an absolute constant so that if has property then determines at least distinct lines (here we only assume )."
In words: at most of the points lie on any one line, and the points determine at least lines, with not depending on or . The range is the print's.
Footnote 1 (p. 102). The conjecture is also a consequence of the results of Szemerédi and Trotter.
Exact count (p. 103). Erdős adds that Kelly and Moser obtained the exact number of these lines when .
Proof pointer
The note gives no proof; it cites J. Beck, The lattice property of the plane and some problems of Dirac, Motzkin and Erdős in combinatorial geometry, Combinatorica 3 (1983), 281--297, and, for the footnote, Szemerédi and Trotter, Combinatorica 3 (1983), 381--392. Erdős's comments on the size of are on conjecture_p103.
Read depth
Claims checked: the statement, the footnote and the sentence on Kelly and Moser were read clause by clause on the page images of pp. 102--103. The cited proofs were not read here. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
- Beck's paper, which the library does not hold.
- Szemerédi and Trotter, Extremal problems in discrete geometry (card szemeredi_1983_extremal_problems_discrete_geometry).
- Kelly and Moser, On the number of ordinary lines determined by n points (card kelly_1958_number_ordinary_lines_determined_points).
Bears on
- Problem 211: the problem asks whether, for , points with at most on a line determine lines, which is the statement reported here; the note's range is instead. The note reports the proofs of Beck and of Szemerédi and Trotter and proves nothing itself.