Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting. Bands, Mmax⁡(k)=k(n−k)+(k2)+1M_{\max}(k)=k(n-k)+\binom k2+1 and Mmin⁡(k)=k(n−k)−(k2)+1M_{\min}(k)=k(n-k)-\binom k2+1 are as in Lemma 1; [x][x] is the integer part of xx. Write K=[n+2]K=[\sqrt{n+2}] (shorthand used here, not the paper's) and, as the paper does on p. 133, f(n)=[n+2]2−nf(n)=[\sqrt{n+2}]^2-n, which is at most 22. The paper labels no theorem; the result is assembled on pp. 133--136 from Lemmas 1 to 4 and declared on p. 137 to give "a complete answer to Grünbaum's problem for n≧n∗n \geqq n^*".

Main result (pp. 133--137). There is an n∗n^* such that for every n≥n∗n\ge n^* the integers mm for which some nn points in the plane determine exactly mm lines are the following.

  1. The separated bands, 0≤k≤K−10\le k\le K-1: m=1m=1 for k=0k=0, and for 1≤k≤K−11\le k\le K-1 every integer from Mmin⁡(k)M_{\min}(k) to Mmax⁡(k)M_{\max}(k) except Mmax⁡(k)−1M_{\max}(k)-1 and Mmax⁡(k)−3M_{\max}(k)-3. For k=1,2k=1,2 these are nn, and 2n−42n-4, 2n−22n-2.
  2. The continuum (p. 134), every integer in the set
    • {m; Mmax⁡(K−1)−3<m<(n2)−3}\{m;\ M_{\max}(K-1)-3<m<\binom n2-3\} in Cases 1 and 2, f(n)=2f(n)=2 or 11;
    • {m; Mmax⁡(K−1)−1<m<(n2)−3}\{m;\ M_{\max}(K-1)-1<m<\binom n2-3\} in Cases 3 and 4, f(n)=0f(n)=0 or −1-1;
    • {m; Mmin⁡(K)−1<m<(n2)−3}\{m;\ M_{\min}(K)-1<m<\binom n2-3\} in Case 5, f(n)<−1f(n)<-1.
  3. The two values (n2)−2\binom n2-2 and (n2)\binom n2.

The five cases describe how the bands k=K−1k=K-1 and k=Kk=K meet (p. 133): Mmin⁡(K)M_{\min}(K) equals Mmax⁡(K−1)−2M_{\max}(K-1)-2, Mmax⁡(K−1)−1M_{\max}(K-1)-1, Mmax⁡(K−1)M_{\max}(K-1), Mmax⁡(K−1)+1M_{\max}(K-1)+1 in Cases 1 to 4, and exceeds Mmax⁡(K−1)+1M_{\max}(K-1)+1 in Case 5.

The constant c=1c=1 (p. 134). From the lower ends of the continuum the paper obtains "the best value of c=1c = 1 in the cn3/2cn^{3/2} bound to the bottom of the continuum", the bound being Erdős's in On a problem of Grünbaum, Canad. Math. Bull. 15 (1972), 23--25, that all values other than (n2)−1\binom n2-1 and (n2)−3\binom n2-3 occur between cn3/2cn^{3/2} and (n2)\binom n2 (p. 130).

The sequence mi(n)m_i^{(n)} (pp. 134--136). Listing the possible values in increasing order as m1(n)<m2(n)<⋯m_1^{(n)}<m_2^{(n)}<\cdots, which is the form in which Grünbaum asked the question, the paper gives explicit formulas: a band with k≥3k\ge3 has 2(k2)−12\binom k2-1 values, the first j+1j+1 bands have h(j)=4+j(j+2)(j−2)/3h(j)=4+j(j+2)(j-2)/3 values for j≥2j\ge2, m1(n)=1m_1^{(n)}=1, m2(n)=nm_2^{(n)}=n, m3(n)=2n−4m_3^{(n)}=2n-4, m4(n)=2n−2m_4^{(n)}=2n-2, formulas (1a)--(1c) give mi(n)m_i^{(n)} inside the band jj for j<K−1j<K-1, and in Cases 3 to 5 also for j=K−1j=K-1, and separate formulas for Cases 1 and 2, Cases 3 and 4, and Case 5 give the rest up to mi(n)=(n2)m_i^{(n)}=\binom n2.

Notes on the print.

  • Formulas (1a)--(1c) (p. 134) take h(j−1)<i≤h(j)h(j-1)<i\le h(j), while the sentence introducing them asks for jj with ii between h(j)h(j) and h(j+1)h(j+1).
  • In Case 5 (p. 136) the indices printed for mi(n)=(n2)−2m_i^{(n)}=\binom n2-2 and mi(n)=(n2)m_i^{(n)}=\binom n2 are written with Mmax⁡([n+2]−1)M_{\max}([\sqrt{n+2}]-1), whereas the range just before them ends at the index h([n+2]−1)−3+(n2)−Mmin⁡([n+2])h([\sqrt{n+2}]-1)-3+\binom n2-M_{\min}([\sqrt{n+2}]), written with Mmin⁡([n+2])M_{\min}([\sqrt{n+2}]); the paper does not comment.
  • The case conditions read f(n)<−1f(n)<-1 for Case 5 on both p. 133 and p. 135.
  • n∗n^* is not computed. The paper says (p. 137) that the case n<n∗n<n^* is left open, needs a detailed analysis of the lower end of the high kk bands and appears difficult, and that n∗n^* is unknown but likely small. Figure 5 (p. 137) shows, for n≤12n\le12, values outside the large-nn formulas at the lower end of the continuum.

Proof pointer

Pp. 132--134. Lemma 2 gives the bands with n≥k(k+1)/2n\ge k(k+1)/2, and the paper notes they are disjoint for small kk and first overlap at k=Kk=K (p. 132). Lemma 3 shows that the upper parts of the larger bands overlap, from which the paper concludes that every value from the first overlap up to (n2)−4\binom n2-4 occurs (pp. 130 and 133). Lemma 4 keeps the bands with k>Kk>K above Mmax⁡(K−1)M_{\max}(K-1). The five cases then locate the first overlap, between the bands K−1K-1 and KK, which gives the lower end of the continuum; the value (n2)\binom n2 comes from points in general position and (n2)−2\binom n2-2 from three collinear points with the others in general position (p. 130).

Read depth

Claims checked: the description of the possible values on pp. 133--134, the five cases, the continuum, the mi(n)m_i^{(n)} formulas on pp. 134--136 and the remarks on n∗n^* on p. 137 were read clause by clause on the page images of the print. The mi(n)m_i^{(n)} formulas were checked here only for agreement with the band and continuum description at the ends of each range, which gave the Case 5 note above. Beck's theorem, used through Lemma 4, is cited, not proved, in the paper. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

Lemma 1, Lemma 2, Lemma 3 and Lemma 4 of the paper. External inputs named by the paper: Kelly and Moser's lower bound, Beck's theorem, and Erdős's 1972 cn3/2cn^{3/2} result.

Source. P. Salamon and P. Erdős, The solution to a problem of Grünbaum, Canad. Math. Bull. 31 (1988), no. 2, 129--138, DOI 10.4153/CMB-1988-020-2; the edition read is named on the source card.

Bears on

  • Problem 606: the result determines the possible values of the number of lines determined by nn points in the plane for every n≥n∗n\ge n^*, which is the problem's question for all sufficiently large nn. It says nothing for n<n∗n<n^*, and n∗n^* is not computed. The problem's claim page for this paper records the answer.