Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Published pp. 228–231, Lemma 3.9 and its proof. (canonical PDF).

As printed (p. 228): let Z={z1,…,zd+1}Z=\{z_1,\ldots,z_{d+1}\} be an arbitrary simplex with circumradius ρ(Z)=ρZ\rho(Z)=\rho^Z and let ϑ>0\vartheta>0 be an arbitrary real. Then there is a simplex V={v1,…,vd+1}V=\{v_1,\ldots,v_{d+1}\} with ρ(V)≤ρZ1+ϑ/8\rho(V)\le\rho^Z\sqrt{1+\vartheta/8} which is α\alpha-hyper Ramsey for α=(ρZ)2(1+ϑ/8)−ρ(V)2\alpha=(\rho^Z)^2(1+\vartheta/8)-\rho(V)^2, and such that ∣∥vi−vi′∥2−∥zi−zi′∥2∣≤ϑ|\|v_i-v_{i'}\|^2-\|z_i-z_{i'}\|^2|\le\vartheta for all 1≤i,i′≤d+11\le i,i'\le d+1 (inequality (17)). Since Definition 3.1 needs α>0\alpha>0, the printed weak radius bound is completed below by a strict one.

Form proved here. Let Z={z1,…,zd+1}Z=\{z_1,\ldots,z_{d+1}\} be a simplex of positive dimension, with circumradius ρ>0\rho>0, and let θ>0\theta>0. There is a simplex V={v1,…,vd+1}V=\{v_1,\ldots,v_{d+1}\} such that

∣∥vi−vj∥2−∥zi−zj∥2∣≤θ(1≤i,j≤d+1),\bigl|\|v_i-v_j\|^2-\|z_i-z_j\|^2\bigr|\le\theta \quad(1\le i,j\le d+1),

and VV is αV\alpha_V-hyper-Ramsey for the strictly positive number

αV=ρ2(1+θ/8)−ρ(V)2>0.\alpha_V=\rho^2(1+\theta/8)-\rho(V)^2>0.

In particular ρ(V)<ρ1+θ/8\rho(V)<\rho\sqrt{1+\theta/8}. The proof is complete relative to the exact external inputs theorem_2_2 and lemma_2_3.

Proof.

Center ZZ at its circumcenter and first divide its coordinates by ρ\rho. Write Δ>0\Delta>0 for the least distance between these normalized vertices. Choose a positive rational number u=p/vu=p/v so small that

u<min⁡{θ,θ/ρ2,1,4Δ},η=u/16.u<\min\{\theta,\theta/\rho^2,1,4\Delta\}, \qquad \eta=u/16.

The strict rational choice both handles rescaling of squared distances and leaves room for a final radius enlargement. Apply Lemma 2.3 with dd and η\eta, obtaining s,k,as,k,a and a dd-dimensional unit sphere in a subspace of Rs\mathbb R^s. Map the normalized simplex isometrically to that subspace and choose spread vectors y1,…,yd+1y_1,\ldots,y_{d+1} within η\eta of its vertices. Both the original and spread vectors have norm one, so

∣∥yi−yj∥2−∥zi/ρ−zj/ρ∥2∣≤4(2η)=u/2.\bigl|\|y_i-y_j\|^2-\|z_i/\rho-z_j/\rho\|^2\bigr| \le4(2\eta)=u/2.

Since 2η<Δ2\eta<\Delta, these spread vectors are distinct. Hence their underlying kk-sets are distinct members of the full family of r=(sk)≥d+1r=\binom sk\ge d+1 sets. Fix their indices once and for all.

Put q=k+1q=k+1 and

ω=8vqr−1,l=tω,b=tp,n=ls+bqr=tD,D=ωs+pqr,\omega=8v q^{r-1},\qquad l=t\omega,\qquad b=tp,\qquad n=ls+bq^r=tD,\qquad D=\omega s+pq^r,

for positive integers tt. Then

bl=u8qr−1,n−lslq=u8,λ=bn=pD>0.\frac{b}{l}=\frac{u}{8q^{r-1}},\qquad \frac{n-ls}{lq}=\frac u8, \qquad \lambda=\frac bn=\frac pD>0.

All parameters of Lemma 3.5 are admissible. Apply its construction and select the d+1d+1 rows associated with the chosen spread vectors. Their vectors are linearly independent, so form a simplex. Remark 3.8 shows that, as tt varies, this simplex has one fixed congruence class. Multiply it by ρ\rho and call the resulting fixed target VV.

Lemma 3.5 gives squared-distance error at most u/2u/2 from the spread vectors before scaling. Combining the two errors and restoring the factor ρ\rho gives error at most ρ2u<θ\rho^2u<\theta from ZZ. Its selected vectors all have squared norm

R02=ρ2(1+u/8).R_0^2=\rho^2(1+u/8).

It remains to construct density witnesses for this fixed VV. For each n=tDn=tD, let Pn\mathcal P_n be all ordered partitions with the part sizes in Lemma 3.5, and map a partition AA to the vector wAw^A having value ρaj/l\rho a_j/\sqrt l on its part AjA_j, where a0=0a_0=0. Let Hn={wA:A∈Pn}H_n=\{w^A:A\in\mathcal P_n\}. Every vector has norm R0R_0, and 0<∣Hn∣≤qn<(q+1)n0<|H_n|\le q^n<(q+1)^n.

This map need not be injective. Group the labels 0,…,k0,\ldots,k according to their common value aja_j. For each distinct value cc, put Lc=∑j:aj=cljL_c=\sum_{j:a_j=c}l_j. Every vector in HnH_n has exactly LcL_c coordinates with value ρc/l\rho c/\sqrt l. To recover its labeled partition, split those positions into the label parts of prescribed sizes. Thus every fiber has the same size

Fn=∏cLc!∏j=0klj!.F_n=\frac{\prod_c L_c!}{\prod_{j=0}^k l_j!}.

It follows that every K⊆HnK\subseteq H_n has an inverse image of exactly the same relative density in Pn\mathcal P_n.

Let MnM_n be the full joint intersection array of the selected d+1d+1 constructed partitions. It is obtained by summing the other coordinates of the full rr-row array. Every cell has size at least b=λnb=\lambda n; all one-row marginals are the common positive integers ljl_j. Theorem 2.2 therefore gives a fixed 0<ϵ<10<\epsilon<1, independent of tt, such that every inverse image of density at least (1−ϵ)n(1-\epsilon)^n contains partitions with joint array MnM_n. Their vector images have exactly the same norms and pairwise squared distances as the selected vectors: each squared distance is the sum of ρ2(aj−aj′)2/l\rho^2(a_j-a_{j'})^2/l over the corresponding pair-label intersection. Hence their images contain a congruent copy of VV. The constant-fiber calculation proves the required weak density threshold for KK itself, including when some aja_j vanish or coincide.

We have witnesses on S(R0,n)S(R_0,n) for every n=tDn=tD, with a fixed target, cardinality base and density base. Fact 3.10 extends them to every sufficiently large dimension, on the same sphere. Finally let

R∗2=ρ2(1+θ/8)>R02.R_*^2=\rho^2(1+\theta/8)>R_0^2.

The radius enlargement in definitions places witnesses exactly on S(R∗,m)S(R_*,m) in every sufficiently large mm, adjusting the density exponent by a fixed factor. Since V⊆S(R0,n)V\subseteq S(R_0,n) in its original realization, ρ(V)≤R0<R∗\rho(V)\le R_0<R_*. Therefore αV=R∗2−ρ(V)2>0\alpha_V=R_*^2-\rho(V)^2>0, as required.

Source precision.

The source normalizes the circumradius and assumes rational θ\theta without spelling out the effect on absolute squared-distance error. The smaller rational uu and the final radius lift prove its exact stated conclusion for every real θ>0\theta>0 and every positive ρ\rho. They also ensure distinct selected spread vectors and strictly positive slack. The source's “natural correspondence” (p. 230) between vectors and partitions is not necessarily one-to-one; the constant-fiber proof is necessary in that generality. Positive-dimensional simplices are the range here; singletons are handled directly by the main theorem.

Bears on. #174.