Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (p. 1). En\mathbb E^n is Rn\mathbb R^n with the Euclidean distance. For an integer m>0m>0, ℓm\ell_m is a set of mm points on a line with consecutive points at distance 11. For finite A,B⊂EnA,B\subset\mathbb E^n, En→(A,B)\mathbb E^n\to(A,B) means that every red-blue coloring of En\mathbb E^n has a red congruent copy of AA or a blue congruent copy of BB, and En↛(A,B)\mathbb E^n\not\to(A,B) means that some red-blue coloring has neither.

Theorem 1 (p. 2, quoted). "For any n>0n>0, there exists a red/blue-coloring of En\mathbb E^n that does not contain any red copy of ℓ3\ell_3 and any blue copy of ℓ1177\ell_{1177}."

In the notation above, En↛(ℓ3,ℓ1177)\mathbb E^n\not\to(\ell_3,\ell_{1177}) for every n>0n>0. The paper presents this as an improvement of Conlon and Wu's En↛(ℓ3,ℓm)\mathbb E^n\not\to(\ell_3,\ell_m) with m=1050m=10^{50} (p. 2).

The coloring (p. 3) is explicit and spherical: a point is red exactly when the integer part of its squared norm lies in {0,4,8,12}+29Z\{0,4,8,12\}+29\mathbb Z,

R={x∈En: ⌊∣x∣2⌋∈{0,4,8,12}+29Z},B=En∖R.\mathcal R=\{x\in\mathbb E^n:\ \lfloor|x|^2\rfloor\in\{0,4,8,12\}+29\mathbb Z\}, \qquad \mathcal B=\mathbb E^n\setminus\mathcal R .

Since the color depends only on ∣x∣|x|, the same rule works in every dimension.

Source. Jakob Führer and Géza Tóth, Progressions in Euclidean Ramsey theory, European Journal of Combinatorics 125 (2025), 104105, doi:10.1016/j.ejc.2024.104105, arXiv:2402.12567: the statement on p. 2, the coloring on p. 3, the proof in Section 2 (pp. 2--6). Labels and pages are those of arXiv:2402.12567v1, the edition named on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the coloring and the statements of Lemmas 1--5 were read clause by clause on the printed pages. The proof was read for structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Section 2, pp. 2--6. Lemma 1 (p. 2): if x,y,zx,y,z form a copy of αℓ3\alpha\ell_3, then ∣x∣2−2∣y∣2+∣z∣2=2α2|x|^2-2|y|^2+|z|^2=2\alpha^2. For a copy of ℓ3\ell_3 with X,Y,ZX,Y,Z the integer parts of the squared norms, Lemma 2 (p. 3) gives X−2Y+Z∈{1,2,3}X-2Y+Z\in\{1,2,3\}, and the paper checks that no choice of X,Y,Z∈{0,4,8,12}X,Y,Z\in\{0,4,8,12\} modulo 2929 meets this, so there is no red ℓ3\ell_3. For a blue copy x0,…,x1176x_0,\ldots,x_{1176} of ℓ1177\ell_{1177}, Lemma 1 makes the squared norms the quadratic k2+βk+X0k^2+\beta k+X_0 in the index kk. Lemma 3 (p. 4) states that no shift of the squares of F29\mathbb F_{29} avoids {0,4,8,12}\{0,4,8,12\}. Dirichlet's approximation theorem (Lemma 4, p. 4) with N=28N=28 picks a step d≤28d\le28, and Lemma 5 (pp. 4--6) shows that the floors of the squared norms of the 4343 points xdjx_{dj}, 0≤j≤420\le j\le42, cover a shift of the squares modulo 2929, so one of them is red.

Dependencies

Dirichlet's approximation theorem, cited from Schmidt; Lemmas 1--5 of the same paper. No corpus result.

Bears on

  • Problem 188: the problem asks for colorings of the plane with no red pair at distance 11 and no blue unit-step kk-term progression. Theorem 1 forbids only a red ℓ3\ell_3, and its red set contains pairs at distance 11 (every point with ∣x∣<1|x|<1 is red), so it gives no bound on the problem's kk. It is a result on the companion line-versus-line question with ℓ3\ell_3 in place of the red unit pair.