Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation (Definition 2, p. 4). A jj-fold colouring of a graph with kk colours assigns to each vertex a jj-element subset of {1,…,k}\{1,\ldots,k\} so that adjacent vertices get disjoint sets; χj(G)\chi_j(G) is the least such kk, and χf(G)=inf⁡jχj(G)/j=lim⁡j→∞χj(G)/j\chi_f(G)=\inf_j\chi_j(G)/j=\lim_{j\to\infty}\chi_j(G)/j. The graph G[1,b]G_{[1,b]} joins two points of R2\mathbb R^2 whose distance lies in [1,b][1,b] (Definition 4, p. 4).

Theorem 3 (p. 6). "If b≥1b\ge1 then χf(G[1,b])≤33⋅b+1−x2x\chi_f(G_{[1,b]})\le\frac{\sqrt3}{3}\cdot\frac{b+\sqrt{1-x^2}}{x} where xx is the root of bx=π6−arcsin⁡(x)bx=\frac{\pi}{6}-\arcsin(x). Moreover there exists a sequence of (n2(b+1)−1)2(\frac{n}{2(b+1)}-1)^2-fold colourings with n2n^2 colours for n≥1n\ge1."

The paper's Table 1 (p. 8) evaluates the bound as 4.364.36, 6.866.86, 9.99.9, 17.6217.62 and 27.5527.55 at b=1b=1, 1.51.5, 22, 33 and 44; the value 4.364.36 at b=1b=1 is the Hochberg-O'Donnell bound χf(G[1,1])≤4.36\chi_f(G_{[1,1]})\le4.36 that the paper says it generalizes (p. 6). The introduction (p. 3) records the then known range 3.555≤χf(G[1,1])≤4.363.555\le\chi_f(G_{[1,1]})\le4.36.

The fold count in the second sentence is printed as shown. It is not an integer in general and is positive also for n<2(b+1)n<2(b+1), where its base is negative. The proof (p. 7) bounds the number hnh_n of colours each point receives from below by 3(nb+1−x2−2)2(bx+x1−x2)\sqrt3\bigl(\frac{n}{b+\sqrt{1-x^2}}-2\bigr)^2(bx+x\sqrt{1-x^2}) and does not derive the printed expression. This is a filing observation, not a review verdict.

Source. J. Grytczuk, K. Junosza-Szaniawski, J. Sokół, K. Węsek, Fractional and jj-fold coloring of the plane, Discrete Comput. Geom. 55 (2016), 594-609, doi:10.1007/s00454-016-9769-3; read in arXiv:1506.01887v2 (5 October 2015), Theorem 3 on p. 6 and its proof on pp. 6-8 of that version. The source card records the edition.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the print. The proof was read for structure only; the paper omits some of its calculations, and none was checked here beyond recomputing the Table 1 values of the bound, which agree with the printed ones rounded up to two decimals (4.35994.3599, 6.85116.8511, 9.89029.8902, 17.617317.6173, 27.546327.5463).

Proof pointer

pp. 6-8. Intersect a disk of unit diameter with a concentric hexagon (Figure 1) to get a set AA whose boundary arcs of length yy and straight segments of length xx satisfy y=π6−arcsin⁡(x)y=\frac{\pi}{6}-\arcsin(x); place copies of AA on a triangular lattice with gaps bb between neighbours, so the union SS has no two points at distance in [1,b][1,b]. Translates of SS by n2n^2 lattice shifts, intersected with a fine hexagonal tiling, give an hnh_n-fold colouring with n2n^2 colours, and letting n→∞n\to\infty bounds χf\chi_f by the reciprocal density of SS. Choosing y=bxy=bx minimizes this bound and gives the stated formula.

Dependencies

The construction generalizes Hochberg and O'Donnell, A large independent set in the unit distance graph, Geombinatorics 3 (1993), no. 4, 83-84, the paper's [5], which has no library card.

Bears on

  • Problem 508: the problem asks for the chromatic number of G[1,1]G_{[1,1]}. At b=1b=1 Theorem 3 gives χf(G[1,1])≤4.36\chi_f(G_{[1,1]})\le4.36, an upper bound on the fractional chromatic number, which never exceeds the chromatic number; it gives no bound on the chromatic number itself.