Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Thomas Jenrich, A 64-dimensional two-distance counterexample to Borsuk's conjecture, arXiv:1308.0206v6 (20 August 2014), 7 pages. The paper numbers no theorems; its result is the content of Section 7, "The 64-dimensional counterexample", which runs from p. 3 to p. 4. See the source card.

Setting

Let GG be the G2(4)G_2(4) graph, a strongly regular graph with parameters (416,100,36,20)(416,100,36,20), on vertex set VV, and let AA be its adjacency matrix (Sections 2--3, pp. 1--2). With smallest eigenvalue s=−4s=-4, the vectors yiy_i, i∈Vi\in V, are the columns of A+4IA+4I: each has a 44 in position ii, a 11 in each of the 100100 positions adjacent to ii, and 00 elsewhere. For distinct i,ji,j, ∥yi−yj∥2\|y_i-y_j\|^2 is 144144 when i,ji,j are adjacent and 192192 otherwise, so the yiy_i form a two-distance set; since the positive eigenvalue has multiplicity f=65f=65, they span a space of dimension at most 6565 (p. 2). A subset of the yiy_i has smaller diameter than the whole set exactly when the corresponding vertices are pairwise adjacent, and, citing Bondarenko, GG has no clique of more than 55 vertices (p. 2).

Section 5 (pp. 2--3) numbers 1,…,651,\dots,65 the 6565 isotropic points of the nondegenerate Hermitian form on PG(2,16)\mathrm{PG}(2,16) used in the construction of GG (Section 4, p. 2), attaches to each vertex the set of its 1515 isotropic points, lets BB be the vertices whose set contains the point 11 and C=V∖BC=V\setminus B, and splits BB into the vertex sets BhB_h of the connected pieces of the subgraph induced on BB. The program G24CHK checks (Section 6, p. 3) that there are three pieces B1,B2,B3B_1,B_2,B_3 of 3232 vertices each, so ∣B∣=96|B|=96 and ∣C∣=320|C|=320, and that each i∈Vi\in V has exactly 2020 neighbours in BhB_h when i∈Bhi\in B_h, none when i∈B∖Bhi\in B\setminus B_h, and 88 when i∈Ci\in C. Sections 7 and 8 take these graph facts as given.

Statement

The 352352 vectors {yi:i∈C∪B1}\{y_i : i\in C\cup B_1\} form a two-distance set spanning a space of dimension at most 6464, and any subset of them of smaller diameter contains at most 55 vectors. Hence they cannot be divided into fewer than 7171 parts of smaller diameter, and since 71>6571>65 the paper concludes (p. 4): "Because 71>64+171 > 64 + 1, the answer to Borsuk's question for n=64n = 64 is negative."

The dimension bound comes from a vector pp in R416\mathbb R^{416}, equal to 11 on B2B_2, −1-1 on B3B_3 and 00 elsewhere, which is orthogonal to every yiy_i with i∈C∪B1i\in C\cup B_1 but not to every yiy_i, i∈Vi\in V; so the dimension drops by at least one from the bound 6565 (pp. 3--4).

Qualifications printed in the section (p. 4).

  • The paper says it can be shown, for instance by vector calculations, that the inequalities dim⁡{yi:i∈V}≤65\dim\{y_i:i\in V\}\le65 and dim⁡{yi:i∈C∪B1}≤64\dim\{y_i:i\in C\cup B_1\}\le64 hold with equality, and that the proofs are not included. The counterexample needs only the upper bounds.
  • It reports Bondarenko's remark that a computer check had shown at least 7272 parts are needed; the section itself proves 7171.

Proof pointer and dependencies

The argument is the inner-product computation of Section 7 (pp. 3--4), which uses the neighbour counts of Section 6 to evaluate ⟨p,yi⟩\langle p,y_i\rangle.

  • The neighbour counts in B1,B2,B3B_1,B_2,B_3 and the sizes ∣Bh∣=32|B_h|=32 rest on the program G24CHK, distributed with the arXiv source; the paper notes that only the count of 88 neighbours for i∈Ci\in C needs the actual construction (p. 3). The program has not been run for this page.
  • The clique bound is taken from Bondarenko's arXiv paper on two-distance sets, cited as [2] (p. 2); the bound 6565 follows from the eigenvalue multiplicity f=65f=65 (p. 2); the remark on 7272 parts is cited from the published version, [3] (p. 4).

Read depth: claims checked. Sections 2--8 were read on the page images of pp. 1--4, clause by clause for the statement and its setting; the computational facts and the cited bounds were not re-derived.

The joint paper with Brouwer, which p. 1 says follows the principal idea of this manuscript but avoids the extensive computational part, is recorded at theorem_1; this manuscript is a separate source and not its locator.

Bears on

  • E0505: after scaling to diameter one, the section's set gives a negative answer in dimension 64, resting on the computer-checked graph facts of Section 6 and on Bondarenko's clique bound, which the manuscript takes as given.