Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Lemma 11 — the constrained unramified pro-2 group
Statement
Let be a finite set of odd rational primes and let be another finite set of rational primes. Assume that an odd number of members of are congruent to modulo . Put
Let be the Galois group over of the compositum of all Galois extensions of which
- have degree a power of ;
- are unramified at every finite place and totally real;
- give inertia degree at most to every prime over ; and
- give inertia degree at most when is inert in .
Write for the minimal number of pro- generators and for the minimal number of relations in a presentation on generators. Then:
- is everywhere unramified and totally real, with . Its inertia degrees at the selected primes are at most , and at most when the rational prime is inert in .
- .
- One has
- In particular, is infinite if
Proof of (1)
The full multiquadratic extension has group . Since is its quadratic subfield cut out by the product of all the square classes, has the asserted rank .
If , then and unramifiedness is immediate. For and each , the quadratic extension lies in the biquadratic field generated over by and . A place that ramifies in this relative quadratic extension must lie over a rational place ramified in both and . No odd prime ramifies in both because and are coprime. At , exactly one of and fails to be modulo : the total number of prime factors that are modulo is odd. Thus does not ramify in both quadratic fields. Each is therefore unramified, and so is their compositum . It is totally real because all are positive.
Every element of has order at most two, so every rational-prime inertia degree in is at most two. If is inert in , its inertia degree there is already two; multiplicativity in the tower makes its relative inertia degree in equal to one. This verifies all local constraints in the definition of .
Proof of (2)
Part (1) makes a quotient of . Generator rank cannot increase on passing to a quotient, so .
Proof of (3)
Let be the Galois group of the maximal totally real, everywhere finite-unramified pro- extension of , before the inertia constraints at are imposed. The number of primes of over the rational primes in is
For a prime over a rational inert in , impose that its Frobenius be trivial. At each other prime in (4), impose that the square of Frobenius be trivial. These are exactly the residue-degree bounds defining . Thus is obtained from by adjoining at most pro- relations. At each step, a new relation either removes one minimal generator or increases the minimal relation count by at most one. Consequently
The external input is Neukirch--Schmidt--Wingberg, Cohomology of Number Fields, second edition, Springer Grundlehren 323 (2008), Theorem 10.7.12. The same numbered statement was checked in the authors' corrected electronic version 2.3 (May 2020), printed p. 675 (physical p. 689). In the specialization used by the source, take its and , treat as ramified, and use that the real quadratic field has , , and . The sums and remaining terms vanish, so the final inequality of that theorem gives . Since here
it follows that . Insert this and (4) into (5) to obtain (2).
Proof of (4)
The second external input is the refined Golod--Shafarevich criterion in the form Sawin attributes to Gaschütz and Vinberg: a nontrivial finitely generated pro- group satisfying
is infinite. The manuscript cites Golod--Shafarevich (1964), Vinberg (1965), and Helmut Koch, Zum Satz von Golod-Schafarewitsch, Mathematische Nachrichten 42 (1969), 321--333, DOI 10.1002/mana.19690420413.
By (2), condition (6) follows if
The right side is increasing in the relevant range . Replacing by the lower bound from part (2) turns (7) exactly into (3). Condition (3) cannot hold in the excluded smaller range, so the replacement loses no case. This proves infinitude.
Source and dependency scope
This is Lemma 11 and equations (9)--(10) on physical pp. 9--11 of the arXiv v1 manuscript. The multiquadratic and quotient arguments are reconstructed. The stated specialization of Neukirch--Schmidt--Wingberg was checked in the identified author-hosted electronic edition. It and the refined Golod--Shafarevich criterion are external theorems and are not proved here.
Used by. [[discrete_geometry/sawin_2026_explicit_lower_bound_unit_distance_problem/lemma_12|Lemma 12]].
Bears on. Problem 90.