Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (p. 121). Let kk points (xi,yi)(x_i,y_i), 1≤i≤k1\le i\le k, have integer coordinates with 0<xi,yi≤n0<x_i,y_i\le n and all (k2)\binom k2 mutual distances distinct.

Inequality (1) (p. 121). Then

(k2)≤(n+12)−1,\binom k2\le\binom{n+1}2-1,

so k≤nk\le n.

Sharpness for small n (p. 121). The paper lists configurations showing that k=nk=n is attained for 2≤n≤72\le n\le7: the points (1,1),(1,2),(3,1),(4,4),(5,3)(1,1),(1,2),(3,1),(4,4),(5,3) for 2≤n≤52\le n\le5 (the print lists the five points for the whole range; for each nn the first nn of them lie in the grid); the points (1,1),(1,2),(2,4),(4,6),(6,3),(6,6)(1,1),(1,2),(2,4),(4,6),(6,3),(6,6) for n=6n=6; and the points (1,1),(1,3),(2,3),(3,7),(4,1),(6,6),(7,7)(1,1),(1,3),(2,3),(3,7),(4,1),(6,6),(7,7) for n=7n=7.

Remark for large n (p. 121). The paper says that the fact that numbers may have more than one representation as a sum of two squares "indicates that this bound cannot be attained for n>15n>15"; it gives no proof of that remark.

Proof pointer

p. 121. The squared distance between two of the points is (xi−xj)2+(yi−yj)2(x_i-x_j)^2+(y_i-y_j)^2, determined by the unordered pair of absolute coordinate differences, each in {0,…,n−1}\{0,\dots,n-1\} and not both zero. There are (n+12)−1\binom{n+1}2-1 such pairs, and distinct distances need distinct pairs.

Read depth

Claims checked: (1), the listed configurations and the remark for n>15n>15 were read clause by clause on the page image of p. 121. The configurations were not checked distance by distance.

Dependencies

None.

Source. P. Erdős, R. K. Guy, Distinct distances between lattice points, Elem. Math. 25 (1970), 121--123; the edition read is named on the source card.

Bears on

  • Problem 1208: the n2n^2 points of the grid form one set of N=n2N=n^2 points in the plane, so (1) gives F2(n2)≤nF_2(n^2)\le n. The sharper inequality (2) supersedes this. The paper does not state the bound in terms of F2F_2.