Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Theorem 2, p. 66, of Peter Fishburn, "Convex polygons with few intervertex distances," Computational Geometry 5 (1995), no. 2, 65--93, doi:10.1016/0925-7721(94)00020-v, the edition named on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the notation of p. 66, the statement, Fig. 1 (p. 67) and the closing paragraph of Section 3 (p. 81) were read clause by clause on the page images. The proofs of Sections 2 and 3 were read for structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Statement

Setting (p. 66). For n≥3n\ge3, Cn\mathscr C_n is the class of all convex nn-gons in the plane, and C≈DC\approx D means that CC and DD are similar (rotation, reflection, translation and uniform rescaling). A subclass of Cn\mathscr C_n "contains NN polygons" when there are pairwise dissimilar C1,…,CN∈CnC_1,\ldots,C_N\in\mathscr C_n such that the subclass consists of exactly the C∈CnC\in\mathscr C_n similar to some CiC_i. RnR_n is the regular nn-gon and Rn−kR_n-k, for k≤n−3k\le n-3, is a regular nn-gon with kk vertices deleted, a member of Cn−k\mathscr C_{n-k}. With vertex set {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\}, m(C)=∣{d(i,j):i≠j}∣m(C)=\lvert\{d(i,j):i\ne j\}\rvert is the number of distinct intervertex distances of CC, and Mn(t)={C∈Cn:m(C)=t}M_n(t)=\{C\in\mathscr C_n: m(C)=t\}.

Theorem 2 (p. 66, quoted). "M4(2)M_4(2) contains 4 polygons, and M6(3)M_6(3) contains 3 polygons: see Fig. 1. For every even n⩾8n\geqslant8, Mn(n/2)M_n(n/2) contains 2 polygons, RnR_n and Rn+1−1R_{n+1}-1."

In the corpus's words: by Altman's bound (Theorem 1) a convex nn-gon with nn even has at least n/2n/2 distinct distances, and for every even n≥8n\ge8 it has exactly n/2n/2 if and only if it is similar to RnR_n or to Rn+1−1R_{n+1}-1.

The small cases (Fig. 1, p. 67, whose caption reads "M2N(N)M_{2N}(N) is all convex 2N2N-gons with exactly NN intervertex distances"). Each polygon is labelled with its multiplicity vector, the multiplicities of its distances in decreasing order without regard to which distance has which (pp. 66, 68):

  • M4(2)M_4(2): A4A_4 with (5,1)(5,1), drawn as a rhombus whose one diagonal is the only other distance; B4B_4 with (4,2)(4,2); R4R_4 with (4,2)(4,2); and R5−1R_5-1 with (3,3)(3,3).
  • M6(3)M_6(3): A6A_6 with (6,6,3)(6,6,3); R6R_6 with (6,6,3)(6,6,3); and R7−1R_7-1 with (5,5,5)(5,5,5).
  • M8(4)M_8(4), as an instance of the general case: R8R_8 with (8,8,8,4)(8,8,8,4) and R9−1R_9-1 with (7,7,7,7)(7,7,7,7).

Proof pointer

The case M4(2)M_4(2) is stated without proof as straightforward (p. 66). M6(3)M_6(3) is Section 2 (pp. 69--71), a case analysis on where the longest distance sits, using Altman's Lemma 1 and his Lemmas 2 and 3 (p. 69). The case n=2Nn=2N, N≥4N\ge4, is Section 3 (pp. 72--81): Lemma 4 (p. 72) confines the longest distances from a chosen vertex 1 to the vertices N+1N+1 and possibly NN or N+2N+2. When 11 has a single longest segment, Lemma 5 (p. 72) makes every segment between opposite vertices jj, j+Nj+N one of the two longest distances, and further use of Lemmas 1--3 forces equal sides and equal short diagonals on one circle, so C≈R2NC\approx R_{2N} (p. 73). Otherwise Lemmas 6--9 (pp. 73--81) place N+2N+2 vertices equally spaced on a circle and then every other vertex on the same circle, giving C≈R2N+1−1C\approx R_{2N+1}-1. The paper notes (p. 81) that this argument fails at N=3N=3, where A6A_6 is a third polygon, and that N=4N=4 also follows from the classification of M7(4)M_7(4) in Theorem 3 by deleting a vertex of an octagon in M8(4)M_8(4) (p. 72).

Dependencies

Theorem 1 and Lemma 1, with Altman's Lemmas 2 and 3 (p. 69).

Bears on

  • Problem 132: the problem asks whether every nn points in the plane have two distances that each occur at least once but between at most nn pairs. The theorem is stated for the vertices of convex polygons only. Its two polygons for even n≥8n\ge8 have every distance occurring at most nn times: in RnR_n each distance other than the diameter occurs nn times and the diameter n/2n/2 times, and in Rn+1−1R_{n+1}-1 each distance occurs n−1n-1 times (a count made here, not printed in the paper). The paper says nothing about sets not in convex position or about the growth of the number of such distances.