Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement and convention. For two oriented planar lines whose unit directions differ, let S(λ1,λ2)S(\lambda_1,\lambda_2) consist of rotations taking the first onto the second with its orientation. This is a horizontal spatial line. Conversely every horizontal spatial line arises this way. Directions opposite to one another are permitted; equal directions are excluded.

Source. Mathialagan, published 2021 PDF, pp. 14--15, Proposition 28. We propagate the sign convention in Proposition 27: the horizontal coordinate is z=−cot⁡(θ/2)z=-\cot(\theta/2) for the counterclockwise angle θ∈(0,2π)\theta\in(0,2\pi) from the first direction to the second.

Proof. Write λi=ai+Rvi\lambda_i=a_i+\mathbb R v_i, with unit oriented directions viv_i. The rotation matrix is forced to be R=RθR=R_\theta. A motion with center oo sends λ1\lambda_1 to Ra1+(I−R)o+Rv2Ra_1+(I-R)o+\mathbb R v_2. Thus precisely the allowed centers satisfy

(I−R)o∈a2−Ra1+Rv2.(1)(I-R)o\in a_2-Ra_1+\mathbb R v_2. \tag{1}

Since I−RI-R is invertible, (1) is an affine line of centers. The angle is fixed, so its spatial image is a horizontal line.

For the converse, let a horizontal spatial line have height zz and center projection o0+Rwo_0+\mathbb R w, where w≠0w\ne0. Select the unique θ\theta with z=−cot⁡(θ/2)z=-\cot(\theta/2), put R=RθR=R_\theta, and take v2v_2 to be a unit vector in the direction (I−R)w(I-R)w. Put v1=R−1v2v_1=R^{-1}v_2. They are unequal because θ≠0\theta\ne0. Choose any a1a_1, and set a2=Ra1+(I−R)o0a_2=Ra_1+(I-R)o_0. Then (1) is exactly the prescribed center line.

Application. For fixed zz and fixed pp, the centers of rotations sending pp onto a prescribed oriented line λ\lambda form S(λ′,λ)S(\lambda',\lambda), where λ′\lambda' is the unique line through pp with direction Rθ−1vλR_\theta^{-1}v_\lambda. As zz runs over R\mathbb R, these give the horizontal ruling in Proposition 42.

Verification scope. Verified within the independently reviewed Theorem 3 chain, retained in the final review; this complete linear-algebra version of the source argument belongs to the living Theorem 3 record.

Bears on. Problem 661.