Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (p. 1). For a finite point set , is the number of unordered pairs of points of at Euclidean distance . For , is the sphere in of diameter centred at the origin, and for , .
Theorem 1 (p. 1, quoted). "There exists such that for any and , ."
The constant is one constant for all and all . The proof (p. 3) remarks that serves when the logarithm is to base , and that the method gives the asymptotic form ; the displays there write for the quantity being bounded.
The paper places Theorem 1 against Leo Moser's conjecture that for every , and against Erdős, Hickerson and Pach (1989), who disproved it with and for all and , the iterated logarithm (p. 1). It records as the best known upper bound, of the right order for and with nothing more known for other (p. 2). It also states, without proof, that Theorem 1 holds for the hyperbolic plane of any curvature with a virtually identical proof, an observation it credits to Endre Makai Jr. (p. 2).
Proof pointer
Section 2 (pp. 2--4). Rotations about the axis through the poles act on as an abelian group of isometries. Take a set of points in a small neighbourhood of a point of the equator; for an ordered pair let be the counterclockwise angle with , the image of under rotation by , and for let be the sum of over .
- Claim 1 (p. 2): for every , can be chosen so that the rotated copies , ranging over the subsets of , are pairwise disjoint.
- Given Claim 1, the union of these copies has points, and two index sets differing in one pair give a unit distance between their copies, so (p. 2). For general , take the with , disjoint slightly rotated copies of and arbitrary extra points (pp. 2--3).
- Claim 1 is proved (pp. 3--4) by small perturbations of that make every pair of index sets satisfy , using Observations 1--4 and Claim 2 (p. 4), which moves two points of along circles so as to change .
Read depth
Claims checked: the definitions, Theorem 1 and Claim 1 were read clause by clause on the page images of the author version named on the source card, and the proof in Section 2 was followed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
None in the corpus. The proof in Section 2 cites no other result.
Source. K. J. Swanepoel and P. Valtr, The unit distance problem on spheres, in Towards a Theory of Geometric Graphs, Contemp. Math. 342, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2004, 273--279, doi:10.1090/conm/342/06148; page numbers refer to the author version named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 605: the problem asks for points on a two-dimensional sphere with at least pairs at one common distance, for some . Theorem 1 gives, on the sphere of diameter for each , points with more than pairs at distance , so is a function of that kind; it does not determine the order of growth of the maximum.