Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Let FF be a finite rooted graph with internal set A≠∅A\ne\varnothing and root set RR. Fix integers 0<a≤b0<a\le b satisfying

b∣S∣≤aeF(S)(S⊆A).b|S|\le a e_F(S)\qquad(S\subseteq A).

Write r=∣R∣r=|R|, e=e(F)e=e(F), and choose dd with

(br+1)e≤d+1.(br+1)e\le d+1.

Let K0⊆KK_0\subseteq K be fields and let P1,…,PaP_1,\ldots,P_a be polynomials in 2b2b variables of degree at most dd, whose coefficients on all monomials of degree at most dd are algebraically independent over K0K_0. Let HH be their polynomial bipartite graph on two copies of KbK^b.

For every fixed placement of the roots and every fixed assignment of sides to the vertices of FF, the set of injective edge-preserving extensions to FF is finite. For each side assignment, these fiber sizes are uniformly bounded over root placements in HH. Consequently some integer t≥1t\ge1 satisfies: HH has no copy of F(t)F^{(t)}.

The integer tt here may depend on the field and generic coefficient tuple. A separate compactness argument supplies a common obstruction suitable for finite fields.

Proof of finiteness

Suppose one fiber SS were infinite. Apply [[extremal_graph_theory/adamczewski_2026_erdos571/polynomial_compactness|compatible independent points]] with h=br+1h=br+1. In an extension of KK, this gives hh compatible placements of FF, and a selected coordinate of each placement, with the hh selected coordinates algebraically independent over KK.

The finite polynomial conditions for each placement include every edge equation, equality of its root coordinates with the prescribed ones, and injectivity. For two vertices assigned to the same side, injectivity is the clause that at least one of their bb coordinate differences is nonzero; vertices on opposite sides are already distinct. If an edge is assigned within one side, its equation can be written 1=01=0, so that side assignment simply has an empty fiber. Compatibility preserves all these conditions. Thus the new placements are injective copies with a common root map.

Let II be the union of their internal images, EE the union of their edge images, and UU the union of all their vertices. Then

∣U∣≤∣I∣+r,∣E∣≤he≤d+1,b∣I∣≤a∣E∣.|U|\le |I|+r,\qquad |E|\le he\le d+1, \qquad b|I|\le a|E|.

The last inequality is [[extremal_graph_theory/adamczewski_2026_erdos571/rooted_union_balance|union balance]]. Let MM denote the number of allowed monomials. The aMaM coefficients together with the hh selected coordinates are algebraically independent over K0K_0: the former are independent over K0K_0, and the latter are independent over the larger field KK containing them. All selected coordinates belong to vertices in UU. The [[extremal_graph_theory/adamczewski_2026_erdos571/polynomial_interpolation|coefficient bound]] gives

h+a∣E∣≤b∣U∣≤b∣I∣+br≤a∣E∣+br.h+a|E|\le b|U|\le b|I|+br\le a|E|+br.

Hence h≤brh\le br, contradicting h=br+1h=br+1. This proves finiteness. The argument remains valid after any extension of KK, since field embeddings preserve algebraic independence of the coefficients over K0K_0.

Uniformity and exclusion of a power

For a fixed side assignment, the edge and injectivity conditions above are a finite polynomial condition, with root coordinates as parameters and internal coordinates as fiber variables. The fibers remain finite in every extension field, as just proved. The [[extremal_graph_theory/adamczewski_2026_erdos571/polynomial_compactness|uniform fiber bound]] supplies a number NκN_\kappa for each side assignment κ:V(F)→{0,1}\kappa:V(F)\to\{0,1\}.

Set t=1+∑κNκt=1+\sum_\kappa N_\kappa. A copy of F(t)F^{(t)} in HH would give tt rooted copies of FF with the same root coordinates. Count these according to their side assignment. In class κ\kappa there are at most NκN_\kappa possibilities. They are genuinely distinct placements: the images of any fixed internal vertex in the different layers are distinct, using A≠∅A\ne\varnothing and injectivity of the whole power. This contradicts the choice of tt.

Source and dependencies

This is the finite-fiber core of Proposition 2.1, p. 2 of the exposition, expanded from the pinned formal declarations GenericRootedFiber.finite_fiber, lines 2941–3043; GenericUniformFiber.uniform_bound, lines 3273–3330; and GenericPowerFree.exists_power_free, lines 3445–3491. The necessary polynomial clauses are defined in PolynomialCopyConstraints, lines 3145–3249. The preceding linked lemmas give every nonroutine deduction. No estimate on the number of rational points of a variety is assumed.

Bears on. #571.