Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Use Ln=Ln(B)L_n=L_n(B), admissible paths, heavy pairs, and Bj\mathcal B_j from good paths. Let HH have NN vertices and maximum degree at most an integer D≥1D\ge1. Let j≥2j\ge2 and s,K,κ,d≥1s,K,\kappa,d\ge1 be integers, and suppose

d≥2s2,D≤κd,B≥2Kκs+1.(1)d\ge2s^2,\qquad D\le\kappa d,\qquad B\ge2K\kappa^{s+1}. \tag{1}

If ∣Bj∣>2NdDj−1|\mathcal B_j|>2NdD^{j-1}, there are a vertex vv, a neighbor xx of vv, distinct neighbors f1,…,fsf_1,\ldots,f_s of vv different from xx, and a family PP of admissible jj-paths starting at xx, such that

∣P∣>KLj−1Dj−1,(2)|P|>KL_{j-1}D^{j-1}, \tag{2}

and every endpoint of a path in PP is heavy-adjacent at length jj to every fif_i. No claim that the members of PP are mutually disjoint is made or needed.

Proof

Fix vv. For each zz let mv(z)m_v(z) be the number of good (j−1)(j-1)-paths from vv to zz, and put

Nv(z)={u∈NH(v):(u,z) is heavy at length j},Mv=∑zmv(z)∣Nv(z)∣.N_v(z)=\{u\in N_H(v):(u,z)\text{ is heavy at length }j\},\qquad M_v=\sum_z m_v(z)|N_v(z)|.

The good-fiber and walk bounds give

mv(z)≤Lj−1,∑zmv(z)≤Dj−1.(3)m_v(z)\le L_{j-1},\qquad \sum_zm_v(z)\le D^{j-1}. \tag{3}

Each bad admissible path has a first vertex uu, a second vertex vv, and a good tail from vv to its last vertex zz, with u∈Nv(z)u\in N_v(z). This encoding is injective. Its reverse need not be admissible, so the valid conclusion is ∣Bj∣≤∑vMv|\mathcal B_j|\le\sum_v M_v. The assumed excess yields some vv with Mv>2dDj−1M_v>2dD^{j-1}.

Discard from the sum the vertices zz with ∣Nv(z)∣≤d|N_v(z)|\le d. By (3), this costs at most dDj−1dD^{j-1}. Thus

∑u∈NH(v)∑z: ∣Nv(z)∣>du∈Nv(z)mv(z)>dDj−1.\sum_{u\in N_H(v)}\sum_{\substack{z:\ |N_v(z)|>d\\u\in N_v(z)}}m_v(z) >dD^{j-1}.

Since ∣NH(v)∣≤D|N_H(v)|\le D, some x∈NH(v)x\in N_H(v) has a set T={z:∣Nv(z)∣>d, x∈Nv(z)}T=\{z:|N_v(z)|>d,\ x\in N_v(z)\} satisfying

∑z∈Tmv(z)>dDj−2.(4)\sum_{z\in T}m_v(z)>dD^{j-2}. \tag{4}

For z∈Tz\in T, set N′(z)=Nv(z)∖{x}N'(z)=N_v(z)\setminus\{x\} and let wz=fj(x,z)w_z=f_j(x,z). Then ∣N′(z)∣≥d|N'(z)|\ge d and wz>Ljw_z>L_j, since xx and zz are heavy-adjacent. Write L=Lj−1L=L_{j-1} and J=LjJ=L_j. Combining (3)–(4) gives

L∑z∈Twz≥J∑z∈Tmv(z)>JdDj−2.(5)L\sum_{z\in T}w_z\ge J\sum_{z\in T}m_v(z)>JdD^{j-2}. \tag{5}

By the threshold recurrence and (1), J>2Kκs+1L2J>2K\kappa^{s+1}L^2. Since D≤κdD\le\kappa d, this implies

Jds+1>2KL2Ds+1.Jd^{s+1}>2KL^2D^{s+1}.

Multiplying (5) by dsd^s and using D,L>0D,L>0 therefore gives

ds∑z∈Twz>2(KLDj−1)Ds.d^s\sum_{z\in T}w_z>2(KLD^{j-1})D^s.

Apply the weighted common-neighborhood lemma from finite selection with ambient set NH(v)N_H(v), neighborhoods N′(z)N'(z), and target weight KLDj−1KLD^{j-1}. It yields distinct f1,…,fsf_1,\ldots,f_s and total common weight greater than that target. Every fif_i differs from xx because it lies in N′(z)N'(z) for at least one positive-weight common neighbor.

Let PP be all admissible jj-paths from xx to those common neighbors in TT. Fibers for different final vertices are disjoint, so their sizes sum to precisely that common weight, proving (2). The defining membership of each fif_i in N′(z)N'(z) proves every required heavy adjacency.

Source and scope

Complete reconstruction of FiniteDenseWeightedLink.select, WeightedAdmissibleSelection.select, AdmissibleHeavyLinks.bad_le_mass and dense_fan, and AdmissibleHeavyCommon.local_select and global, pinned Lean lines 7174–7415 and 9532–9637. The exposition, p. 5, states the pruning mechanism without this weighted calculation. Both strict inequalities and the loss of one neighbor when deleting xx are retained here.

Used by. Uniform heavy-path pruning.

Bears on. #571.