Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Alon, Theorem 1.1, statement on paper p. 1 and proof on pp. 3-4 (PDF pp. 1, 3-4).

Statement

For a graph GG, let b(G)b(G) be the maximum number of edges in a bipartite subgraph, and define

F(e)=min⁡∣E(G)∣=eb(G).F(e)=\min_{|E(G)|=e} b(G).

There are constants c>0c>0 and n0n_0 such that, for every even integer n>n0n>n_0 and e=n2/2e=n^2/2,

F(e)≥e2+e8+ce1/4.F(e)\geq \frac e2+\sqrt{\frac e8}+ce^{1/4}.

Equivalently, for every sufficiently large positive integer mm, every graph with 2m22m^2 edges has a bipartite subgraph with at least m2+m/2+c′mm^2+m/2+c'\sqrt m edges, for another absolute constant c′>0c'>0.

Dependencies and notation

The proof uses Lemma 2.1 and the Edwards lower bound [[extremal_graph_theory/edwards_1973_extremal_properties_bipartite_subgraphs/theorem_12|Theorem 12]]. For disjoint vertex sets A,BA,B, write e(A)e(A) for the number of edges inside AA and e(A,B)e(A,B) for the number between them. A maximum bipartite subgraph may be taken to be a cut: the two classes of any bipartite subgraph define a cut of the ambient graph containing all its edges.

Rewritten proof

Fix a sufficiently small constant ε>0\varepsilon>0, say ε=1/100\varepsilon=1/100. Let nn be a sufficiently large even integer and let GG have e=n2/2e=n^2/2 edges.

Case 1: the chromatic number is below the threshold

Suppose GG is 2s2s-colorable for an integer ss satisfying

2s≤n−εn+1.2s\leq n-\varepsilon\sqrt n+1.

Lemma 2.1 gives

b(G)≥e2+e4s−2≥e2+n24n−4εn≥e2+n4+ε4n=e2+e8+ε21/44e1/4.\begin{aligned} b(G) &\geq \frac e2+\frac{e}{4s-2}\\ &\geq \frac e2+\frac{n^2}{4n-4\varepsilon\sqrt n}\\ &\geq \frac e2+\frac n4+\frac{\varepsilon}{4}\sqrt n\\ &=\frac e2+\sqrt{\frac e8} +\frac{\varepsilon 2^{1/4}}4e^{1/4}. \end{aligned}

The third line uses (1−x)−1≥1+x(1-x)^{-1}\geq1+x for 0≤x<10\leq x<1.

Case 2: the chromatic number is near nn

Now suppose χ(G)≥n−εn\chi(G)\geq n-\varepsilon\sqrt n. Write χ(G)=n−k\chi(G)=n-k. In a proper coloring with the minimum number of colors, every pair of color classes has an edge between them, so (χ(G)2)≤e<(n+12)\binom{\chi(G)}2\leq e<\binom{n+1}2. Hence 0≤k≤εn0\leq k\leq\varepsilon\sqrt n. Take a vertex-critical (n−k)(n-k)-chromatic subgraph HH. Every vertex of HH has degree at least n−k−1n-k-1. Therefore, writing h=∣V(H)∣h=|V(H)|,

h(n−k−1)≤2∣E(H)∣≤n2,h(n-k-1)\leq2|E(H)|\leq n^2,

and hence h≤n+2εnh\leq n+2\varepsilon\sqrt n once nn is large.

Color HH properly with n−kn-k colors. If aa color classes are singletons, then

h≥a+2(n−k−a)=2(n−k)−a,h\geq a+2(n-k-a)=2(n-k)-a,

so a≥n−4εna\geq n-4\varepsilon\sqrt n. Any two classes in a coloring using the minimum number of colors have an edge between them; otherwise they could be merged. The singleton classes consequently form a clique. Thus GG contains a clique UU on n−rn-r vertices for some 0≤r≤4εn0\leq r\leq4\varepsilon\sqrt n. Put W=V(G)∖UW=V(G)\setminus U and q=n−rq=n-r. Direct calculation gives

e(U)=(q2)=n22−(2r+1)n2+r(r+1)2e(U)=\binom q2 =\frac{n^2}{2}-\frac{(2r+1)n}{2}+\frac{r(r+1)}2

and

D:=e(W)+e(U,W)=r(n−r)+n2+r2−r2.(5)D:=e(W)+e(U,W) =r(n-r)+\frac n2+\frac{r^2-r}{2}. \tag{5}

The last expression is rq+Arq+A, where A=(n+r2−r)/2A=(n+r^2-r)/2. With ε=1/100\varepsilon=1/100 and nn large, ∣A−n/2∣≤n/100|A-n/2|\leq n/100 and q=n−r≥99n/100q=n-r\geq99n/100. Thus both AA and q−Aq-A exceed n/4n/4, so the distance from AA to every multiple of qq is at least n/4n/4. The same is true of DD; in particular, D≥n/4D\geq n/4.

Subcase 2a: e(W)≥n/32e(W)\geq n/32

Apply the Edwards bound inside WW to obtain a partition W=W1⊔W2W=W_1\sqcup W_2 with

e(W1,W2)≥e(W)2+e(W)8+O(1)≥e(W)2+n16+O(1).e(W_1,W_2) \geq\frac{e(W)}2+\sqrt{\frac{e(W)}8}+O(1) \geq\frac{e(W)}2+\frac{\sqrt n}{16}+O(1).

Balance the complete graph on UU into U1⊔U2U_1\sqcup U_2. Its cut has ⌊q2/4⌋\lfloor q^2/4\rfloor edges, and therefore

e(U1,U2)≥e(U)2+e(U)8+O(1)≥e(U)2+e8−εn+O(1).e(U_1,U_2) \geq\frac{e(U)}2+\sqrt{\frac{e(U)}8}+O(1) \geq\frac{e(U)}2+\sqrt{\frac e8} -\varepsilon\sqrt n+O(1).

There are two ways to align the cuts of UU and WW. The numbers of UU-WW edges crossing in the two alignments sum to e(U,W)e(U,W), so one alignment keeps at least half of them. For that alignment,

b(G)≥e(U)+e(W)+e(U,W)2+e8+(1/16−ε)n+O(1)=e2+e8+Ω(e1/4).\begin{aligned} b(G) &\geq \frac{e(U)+e(W)+e(U,W)}2 +\sqrt{\frac e8} +(1/16-\varepsilon)\sqrt n+O(1)\\ &=\frac e2+\sqrt{\frac e8}+\Omega(e^{1/4}). \end{aligned}

Subcase 2b: e(W)<n/32e(W)<n/32

By (5), e(U,W)=D−e(W)e(U,W)=D-e(W) has distance at least n/5n/5 from every multiple of qq. List UU as v1,…,vqv_1,\ldots,v_q so that their numbers of neighbors in WW satisfy d1≤⋯≤dqd_1\leq\cdots\leq d_q, and put

U1={v1,…,v⌊q/2⌋},U2=U∖U1.U_1=\{v_1,\ldots,v_{\lfloor q/2\rfloor}\}, \qquad U_2=U\setminus U_1.

Let dˉ=e(U,W)/q\bar d=e(U,W)/q and δ=n/(5q)\delta=n/(5q). The distance from dˉ\bar d to every integer is at least δ\delta; also dˉ≥δ\bar d\geq\delta. If d⌊q/2⌋≥dˉd_{\lfloor q/2\rfloor}\geq\bar d, integrality gives d⌊q/2⌋≥dˉ+δd_{\lfloor q/2\rfloor}\geq\bar d+\delta. Every vertex of U2U_2 has at least that many neighbors in WW, and hence

e(U2,W)≥e(U,W)2+n10.e(U_2,W)\geq\frac{e(U,W)}2+\frac n{10}.

Otherwise every vertex of U1U_1 has at most dˉ−δ\bar d-\delta neighbors in WW. Since dˉ≥δ\bar d\geq\delta, the inequality $\lfloor q/2\rfloor(\bar d-\delta)\leq q(\bar d-\delta)/2$ gives the same conclusion after subtracting e(U1,W)e(U_1,W) from e(U,W)e(U,W). This also handles odd qq.

Use the cut (U1∪W,U2)(U_1\cup W,U_2). Since the complete graph on UU contributes ⌊q2/4⌋\lfloor q^2/4\rfloor edges,

b(G)≥e(U1,U2)+e(U2,W)≥e(U)2+e8−εn+O(1)+e(U,W)2+n10=e2+e8−εn−e(W)2+n10+O(1)≥e2+e8+(1/10−1/64)n−εn+O(1).\begin{aligned} b(G) &\geq e(U_1,U_2)+e(U_2,W)\\ &\geq \frac{e(U)}2+\sqrt{\frac e8} -\varepsilon\sqrt n+O(1) +\frac{e(U,W)}2+\frac n{10}\\ &=\frac e2+\sqrt{\frac e8} -\varepsilon\sqrt n-\frac{e(W)}2+\frac n{10}+O(1)\\ &\geq\frac e2+\sqrt{\frac e8} +(1/10-1/64)n-\varepsilon\sqrt n+O(1). \end{aligned}

This is stronger than the claimed ce1/4ce^{1/4} improvement once nn is large. The two cases complete the proof.

Consequence for Problem 127

For e=n2/2e=n^2/2,

8e+1−18=e8+O(1).\frac{\sqrt{8e+1}-1}{8} =\sqrt{\frac e8}+O(1).

The theorem therefore makes the integral correction above the exact Edwards baseline at least ce1/4−O(1)ce^{1/4}-O(1) along the infinite sequence of even nn. It tends to infinity.

Bears on