Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Lemma 2 (p. 8). For a connected graph GG,

b(G)≥e(G)2+∣G∣−14,b(G)\geq\frac{e(G)}2+\frac{|G|-1}{4},

where b(G)b(G) (the paper's f(G)f(G)) is the largest number of edges in a cut and ∣G∣|G| is the number of vertices. The paper attributes the bound to Edwards and cites a short proof by Erdős, Gyárfás and Kohayakawa (p. 8).

Source. B. Bollobás and A. D. Scott, Better bounds for Max Cut, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud. 10 (2002), 185-246; Lemma 2 on p. 8 of the authors' manuscript described in the source digest, proof on pp. 8-9, an alternative ordering procedure on pp. 9-10.

Read depth. Claims checked: statement read clause by clause on the page images on 2026-10-08; the proof on pp. 8-9 was read and followed.

Proof pointer

Pages 8-9. Placing the vertices one at a time, each on the side holding fewer of its earlier neighbours, cuts at least e(G)/2+q/2e(G)/2+q/2 edges, where qq counts vertices with an odd number of earlier neighbours. A spanning tree splits off, one at a time, small induced stars whose removal keeps the graph connected; ordering each star's leaves around its centre by the parity of their earlier neighbours makes at least half of every star odd, so q≥(∣G∣−1)/2q\geq(|G|-1)/2. The paper notes that the procedure runs in time O(m)O(m) and gives a second ordering procedure on pp. 9-10. It also derives the Edwards bound for all graphs from Lemma 2 (p. 10).

Bears on

  • Theorem 1: used to bound the number of vertices of an extremal graph.
  • Problem 127: a proof of the Edwards baseline whose excess the problem asks about.