Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Lemma 2 (p. 8). For a connected graph ,
where (the paper's ) is the largest number of edges in a cut and is the number of vertices. The paper attributes the bound to Edwards and cites a short proof by Erdős, Gyárfás and Kohayakawa (p. 8).
Source. B. Bollobás and A. D. Scott, Better bounds for Max Cut, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud. 10 (2002), 185-246; Lemma 2 on p. 8 of the authors' manuscript described in the source digest, proof on pp. 8-9, an alternative ordering procedure on pp. 9-10.
Read depth. Claims checked: statement read clause by clause on the page images on 2026-10-08; the proof on pp. 8-9 was read and followed.
Proof pointer
Pages 8-9. Placing the vertices one at a time, each on the side holding fewer of its earlier neighbours, cuts at least edges, where counts vertices with an odd number of earlier neighbours. A spanning tree splits off, one at a time, small induced stars whose removal keeps the graph connected; ordering each star's leaves around its centre by the parity of their earlier neighbours makes at least half of every star odd, so . The paper notes that the procedure runs in time and gives a second ordering procedure on pp. 9-10. It also derives the Edwards bound for all graphs from Lemma 2 (p. 10).
Bears on
- Theorem 1: used to bound the number of vertices of an extremal graph.
- Problem 127: a proof of the Edwards baseline whose excess the problem asks about.