Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Here GG is a finite simple graph on n=q2+q+1n=q^2+q+1 vertices containing no cycle of length four as a subgraph, and Δ(G)\Delta(G) is its maximum degree.

Lemma (p. 188, unnumbered, quoted). "Let GG be a quadrilateral-free graph on q2+q+1q^2+q+1 vertices. If the maximal degree of GG, Δ(G)\Delta(G), satisfies Δ(G)⩾q+2\Delta(G)\geqslant q+2, then ∣E(G)∣⩽12q(q+1)2|E(G)|\leqslant\frac12q(q+1)^2."

The Lemma carries no parity or prime-power hypothesis on qq; qq enters only through the number of vertices.

Refinement (p. 189, unnumbered). After the Lemma's proof, closing Section 3, the paper records that the same proof gives more: if GG satisfies the Lemma's hypotheses and Δ(G)≥q+1+a\Delta(G)\geq q+1+a for some a≥1a\geq1, then

2∣E(G)∣≤n(q+1)−1−a(q−1).2|E(G)|\leq n(q+1)-1-a(q-1).

Since n(q+1)=q(q+1)2+q+1n(q+1)=q(q+1)^2+q+1, the right side equals q(q+1)2+q−a(q−1)q(q+1)^2+q-a(q-1), so the refinement improves on the Lemma's bound once a(q−1)>qa(q-1)>q (an observation of this page; the paper states the refinement without further comment).

Source. Z. Füredi, Graphs without Quadrilaterals, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 34 (1983), 187-190: Section 2, the unnumbered Lemma on p. 188; its proof is Section 3 on p. 189, which closes with the refinement. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the refinement were read clause by clause on the printed pages. The proof was followed in outline only; no independent proof review is recorded.

Proof pointer

Section 3, p. 189. Fix a vertex of maximum degree d≥q+2d\geq q+2. Since two vertices have at most one common neighbour, each other vertex has all but at most one of its neighbours outside that vertex's neighbourhood, and counting pairs outside the neighbourhood bounds a sum of binomial coefficients of the degrees. Assuming more than q(q+1)2/2q(q+1)^2/2 edges, Jensen's inequality turns this into the polynomial inequality (3), which the two inequalities (4) and (5), valid for d≥q+2d\geq q+2, contradict.

Dependencies

None beyond the definitions; the proof is self-contained.

Used by

The Theorem and the Proposition of the same paper, which treat the remaining case Δ(G)≤q+1\Delta(G)\leq q+1 using that qq is even.

Bears on

  • Problem 765: an upper bound on ex⁡(n;C4)\operatorname{ex}(n;C_4) at the orders n=q2+q+1n=q^2+q+1, valid only for graphs of maximum degree at least q+2q+2. It is an ingredient of the paper's exact values at those orders and does not by itself give the asymptotic formula the problem asks for.